The vivo S10e and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both devices utilize 6nm chipsets, they diverge significantly in charging technology and processor architecture, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers. This comparison dives deep into these differences to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a generally smoother experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the vivo S10e’s 44W, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a slightly more refined experience for everyday tasks, despite the Dimensity 900's theoretical CPU advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 18 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.5 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | V2130A | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo S10e
- Potentially more efficient Dimensity 900 chipset for sustained tasks.
- Sleek design language typical of vivo.
- Competitive price point.
- Slower 44W charging compared to the Redmi.
- Potentially less optimized gaming performance.
- Limited charging standard support.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Significantly faster 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support.
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 offers a smoother experience for everyday tasks.
- Likely better GPU performance for gaming.
- Dimensity 900 may offer slightly better multi-core CPU performance.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing.
- Potential for more bloatware.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize AMOLED panels. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ often features a 120Hz refresh rate in other markets, which, if present in the India variant, would be a significant advantage. The absence of LTPO technology on either suggests standard refresh rate scaling, impacting battery life during dynamic content viewing. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is known for its high-resolution main sensors in other markets (often 108MP or 200MP). If the India variant follows suit, it would offer a significant advantage in detail capture over the likely lower-resolution sensor in the vivo S10e. Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is a key feature to look for, and its presence on either device would improve low-light photography and video stabilization. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both phones suggests these are largely marketing features with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset: the vivo S10e employs the Mediatek Dimensity 900, featuring 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G with 2x 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x 1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While the Dimensity 900 boasts slightly higher peak clock speeds on its prime cores, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized CPU architecture and potentially better GPU performance. Both are built on a 6nm process, suggesting similar efficiency, but Qualcomm’s Adreno GPU generally provides a more consistent gaming experience. RAM speed (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5) is unknown for both, but would further impact performance.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) takes a clear lead with its 67W wired charging, advertised to reach 50% in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. This is a substantial improvement over the vivo S10e’s 44W charging. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery on the Redmi. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3 support on the Redmi also provides greater charging compatibility with a wider range of chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S10e if you prioritize a potentially more efficient processor for sustained workloads and prefer a brand known for its design aesthetics. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value incredibly fast charging, a more widely supported charging standard (PD3.0, QC3), and a generally more responsive user experience for common tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While not a flagship-level chipset, the Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium settings with stable frame rates. The Adreno GPU provides a better gaming experience than comparable MediaTek GPUs in this price range. However, expect some frame drops during intense firefights, and prolonged gaming sessions may lead to thermal throttling.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) compared to the 44W charging on the vivo S10e in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) can realistically shave off 20-30 minutes of charging time compared to the vivo S10e. The advertised 0-100% time of 42 minutes for the Redmi is a significant advantage, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. The vivo S10e will require a longer charging duration to reach full capacity.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Dimensity 900 and Snapdragon 695 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For typical daily usage, the difference in CPU performance is unlikely to be dramatically noticeable. Both chipsets are capable of handling everyday tasks smoothly. However, the Snapdragon 695’s optimized architecture and potentially better RAM management may result in a slightly more responsive user experience, particularly when multitasking.
