vivo S10e vs Oppo Reno6 5G: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno6 5G edges out the vivo S10e thanks to its faster 65W charging and potentially superior camera capabilities. However, the vivo S10e might offer a slightly more attractive price point, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S10e | Oppo Reno6 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 7, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 18 | 2021, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.5 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 65W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Stellar Black, Aurora, Blue, Purple |
| Models | V2130A | PEQM00, CPH2251 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | € 146.99 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 362450 (v8), 430765 (v9) GeekBench: 2131 (v5.1) |
vivo S10e
- Stylish Design
- Smooth Performance for Everyday Tasks
- Potentially More Affordable
- Slower Charging (44W)
- Unknown Battery Capacity
- Potentially Inferior Camera
Oppo Reno6 5G
- Faster Charging (65W)
- Brighter Display (632 nits)
- Potentially Better Camera
- Excellent Battery Life (109h Endurance)
- Potentially Higher Price
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar 6.43-inch AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Oppo Reno6 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 632 nits, which is noticeably brighter than the S10e, providing better visibility in direct sunlight. The Reno6 5G also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, though this is a nominal value. Overall, the Reno6 5G has a slight edge in display performance.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Oppo Reno6 5G is generally expected to have a slightly better camera setup. Specific camera specs are missing, but Oppo often prioritizes camera quality in their Reno series. Expect improved image processing and potentially better low-light performance from the Reno6 5G. The S10e likely focuses on selfie capabilities.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset and an Octa-core CPU, meaning performance should be largely comparable for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal, depending on software optimization.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno6 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 109 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The vivo S10e's battery capacity is unknown, but the Reno6 5G's superior battery life is a significant advantage. Furthermore, the Reno6 5G's 65W wired charging is considerably faster than the S10e's 44W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo S10e is ideal for users prioritizing a stylish design and smooth everyday performance without breaking the bank. The Oppo Reno6 5G is a better choice for those who value faster charging, potentially better camera quality, and a slightly more premium feel.