OnePlus Nord 2T vs. vivo S10e: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2T emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 1300 chipset delivers noticeably improved performance, and the 80W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, significantly reducing downtime. While the S10e remains a viable option, the Nord 2T offers a more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S10e | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 18 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.5 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Auto HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | V2130A | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S10e
- Sleek and lightweight design (assumed)
- Competitive price point (likely)
- Decent everyday performance
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 900)
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Faster and more powerful chipset (Dimensity 1300)
- Ultra-fast 80W SuperVOOC charging
- Higher display brightness (636 nits)
- Potentially higher price (depending on region)
- Software bloat (typical of OnePlus)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a measured peak brightness of 636 nits, providing a more visible experience outdoors compared to the S10e (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the 'infinite' contrast ratio on the Nord 2T, the Nord 2T’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate management, potentially impacting battery life during dynamic content viewing. Bezels are likely comparable, given the similar market positioning, but detailed measurements are needed for a definitive assessment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. The absence of sensor size or aperture data makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Nord 2T’s likely more advanced image signal processor (ISP), coupled with the more powerful chipset, suggests superior image processing capabilities. The S10e may rely more heavily on software enhancements to compensate for potentially less capable hardware. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests limited utility; focusing on the main sensor’s quality is more crucial.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s Dimensity 1300, with its 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core and three additional 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, significantly outperforms the vivo S10e’s Dimensity 900 (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The Nord 2T’s more powerful GPU will handle graphically demanding games with higher frame rates. While both use 6nm fabrication, the architectural improvements in the 1300 provide a clear edge. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR4X is likely on both, with the Nord 2T potentially offering faster variants.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. However, the OnePlus Nord 2T’s 80W SuperVOOC charging with PD support is a massive advantage. This allows for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the S10e’s 44W wired charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference, providing greater convenience and reducing range anxiety.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S10e if you prioritize a sleek design and are comfortable with slightly slower performance and charging speeds. It's a good fit for everyday users who primarily browse, message, and occasionally snap photos. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you demand faster processing for gaming or multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid 80W charging – ideal for power users and those constantly on the go.