vivo S10e vs Motorola Edge 20 Fusion: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Mediatek Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo S10e emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 900, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a slight performance edge and potentially better thermal management. The faster 44W charging is a significant convenience, offsetting the Motorola's marginally larger battery capacity in real-world usage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S10e | Motorola Edge 20 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 18 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.5 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Models | V2130A | - |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo S10e
- More efficient Dimensity 900 chipset
- Faster 44W wired charging
- Potentially better image processing due to ISP
- Potentially less refined software experience (depending on vivo's FunTouch OS)
- Battery capacity likely smaller than the Fusion
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- Potentially more natural camera processing
- Likely a more streamlined software experience
- Potentially larger battery capacity
- Less powerful Dimensity 800U chipset
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Older process node (7nm) may lead to more heat
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature AMOLED panels common in this price bracket. However, the chipset differences hint at potential variations in display driver efficiency. The S10e's Dimensity 900, being newer, *could* benefit from improved display processing capabilities. Bezels are likely comparable, but color accuracy and peak brightness would require direct testing. Motorola historically focuses on relatively accurate color profiles, while vivo often leans towards more vibrant, saturated colors.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset's ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a crucial role. The Dimensity 900 in the S10e features an upgraded ISP compared to the 800U, potentially leading to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. Motorola often emphasizes natural-looking images, while vivo tends towards more processed, vibrant photos. The presence (or absence) of OIS on the main sensor would be a significant differentiator, but this information is unavailable. We can assume both phones include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the S10e's ISP gives it a potential edge in image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo S10e boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm) versus the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 900 is inherently more power-efficient, translating to better thermal performance under sustained load. Both CPUs feature the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, but the S10e utilizes the newer Cortex-A78 performance cores (2x2.4 GHz) compared to the Fusion’s Cortex-A76 (2x2.4 GHz). While clock speeds are identical, the A78 architecture offers a roughly 5-10% IPC (Instructions Per Clock) improvement. This means the S10e will handle complex tasks and gaming slightly more efficiently. The impact of RAM speed (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5) is not specified, but LPDDR5 would further benefit the S10e.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion likely has a slightly larger battery capacity, but the vivo S10e compensates with significantly faster 44W wired charging compared to the Fusion’s 30W. This difference is substantial. While a larger battery *can* translate to longer screen-on time, the S10e’s faster charging means less time tethered to a wall. A full charge from 0-100% on the S10e will likely take under an hour, while the Fusion could require over 90 minutes. The Dimensity 900’s 6nm efficiency also contributes to potentially lower power consumption during typical usage, mitigating the battery capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S10e if you prioritize sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value faster charging speeds for minimal downtime. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you prefer a potentially more refined software experience (depending on Motorola's skin) and are less concerned with pushing the chipset to its absolute limits. The Fusion is a solid all-rounder, but the S10e offers a more focused performance profile.