The vivo S10e and Honor X8c represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices leverage 6nm chipsets for efficiency, but diverge significantly in their processor choices and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone delivers the best experience for various user needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the vivo S10e emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 900 chipset offers a noticeable performance edge over the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X8c, making it better suited for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Honor X8c provides excellent value for those seeking a reliable daily driver with good battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 18 | 2025, January 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Available. Released 2025, January 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.5 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 161.1 x 74.6 x 7.1 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 2800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 15, MagicOS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0/5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 35W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Marrs Green, Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Cloud Purple |
| Models | V2130A | ABR-LX1, ABR-LX2, ABR-LX3 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | € 190.78 / $ 213.42 / £ 159.00 |
vivo S10e
- Faster 44W charging for quicker top-ups.
- More powerful Dimensity 900 chipset for better performance.
- Potentially superior image processing capabilities.
- May experience slightly shorter battery life due to higher power consumption.
- Price is likely higher than the Honor X8c.
Honor X8c
- Excellent value for money.
- Efficient Snapdragon 685 chipset for potentially longer battery life.
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks.
- Slower 35W charging.
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Dimensity 900.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely utilize LCD panels. The choice between them will likely hinge on color accuracy and peak brightness, which would require direct testing. Bezels are also a key consideration, impacting immersion, and would need to be assessed visually. Expect both to target a 60Hz refresh rate, common in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a role in image signal processing (ISP) capabilities. The Dimensity 900 generally offers a more advanced ISP, potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and lens apertures makes it impossible to determine which phone has a superior camera system. It's likely both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality of the main sensor will be the most critical factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo S10e’s Mediatek Dimensity 900, built on a 6nm process, features a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Honor X8c’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, also 6nm, but utilizing 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. While the Snapdragon 685 boasts higher clock speeds on its prime cores, the Dimensity 900’s Cortex-A78 architecture provides superior single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The Dimensity 900 also generally offers a more capable GPU, benefiting gaming performance. The impact of RAM type (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5) is unknown, but LPDDR5 would further enhance the S10e's performance.
Battery Life
The Honor X8c’s 35W charging is slower than the vivo S10e’s 44W charging. This means the S10e will likely achieve a 0-100% charge in a shorter timeframe. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Snapdragon 685 is known for its efficiency, potentially offsetting the S10e’s faster charging with longer battery life. The real-world impact will depend on usage patterns, but the S10e offers a quicker top-up when needed.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S10e if you need a phone capable of handling more intensive applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and value the convenience of 44W fast charging. Buy the Honor X8c if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on efficiency, long battery life, and a more affordable price point. The X8c is ideal for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X8c struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 685 is capable of running PUBG, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. Genshin Impact may require significant compromises in graphics settings and may still experience occasional stuttering. The Dimensity 900 in the vivo S10e will provide a noticeably smoother gaming experience with higher graphical settings.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 35W and 44W, and will I notice it in daily use?
The difference is noticeable. While both are considered fast charging, 44W will typically charge a phone from 0-100% approximately 20-30 minutes faster than 35W. This translates to less time tethered to a charger and more convenient top-ups throughout the day.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (Cortex-A78 vs Cortex-A73) really that important for everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference may be minimal. However, the Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 900 offer a significant performance boost when multitasking, running demanding apps, or editing photos/videos. This results in a smoother and more responsive user experience overall.
