vivo S10 vs Oppo Reno6 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the vivo S10 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Reno6 5G’s Dimensity 900. However, the Reno6 5G’s comparable battery endurance and potentially refined camera processing make it a strong contender for those valuing balanced features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S10 | Oppo Reno6 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 7, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 15 | 2021, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 22 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.23 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 65W wired |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue, Yellow | Stellar Black, Aurora, Blue, Purple |
| Models | V2121A | PEQM00, CPH2251 |
| Price | About 370 EUR | € 146.99 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 362450 (v8), 430765 (v9) GeekBench: 2131 (v5.1) |
vivo S10
- More powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Faster charging than many competitors
- Charging speed is slower than the Reno6 5G
- Camera specifications are unknown
Oppo Reno6 5G
- Faster 65W charging
- Comparable battery endurance
- Potentially refined camera image processing
- Less powerful Dimensity 900 chipset
- Lower peak CPU clock speeds
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno6 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 632 nits, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. While the vivo S10’s display specifications are not provided, both devices likely utilize AMOLED panels given their market positioning. The Reno6 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) is typical of AMOLED technology, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. Without knowing the S10’s panel characteristics, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Reno6 5G’s measured brightness provides a concrete advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Reno6 5G’s brand reputation suggests a focus on image processing and color science. The absence of details on the S10’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities beyond marketing claims. We can assume both will offer standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the quality will depend heavily on the underlying hardware and software tuning.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo S10’s MediaTek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) features an octa-core configuration with 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Oppo Reno6 5G utilizes the Dimensity 900 (6nm) with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The S10’s higher clock speeds on its prime cores and additional A78 core translate to superior multi-core and single-core performance, particularly beneficial for demanding applications. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 1100’s architecture provides a clear advantage for power users.
Battery Life
Both the vivo S10 and Oppo Reno6 5G achieve an endurance rating of 109 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, charging speeds differ significantly. The S10 supports 44W wired charging, while the Reno6 5G boasts 65W wired charging. This means the Reno6 5G will replenish its battery much faster, potentially offering a more convenient experience for users who frequently need to top up their device. The faster charging partially offsets the identical endurance ratings.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S10 if you frequently engage in demanding tasks like mobile gaming or video editing and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Oppo Reno6 5G if you prioritize a balanced experience with solid battery life and a potentially more polished software experience, and aren't as concerned with having the absolute fastest processor.