vivo S10 vs Motorola Edge 20 Fusion: A Deep Dive into Mediatek's Mid-Range Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the vivo S10 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U. However, the Edge 20 Fusion remains a strong contender for those seeking a balanced experience at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S10 | Motorola Edge 20 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 15 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 22 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.23 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue, Yellow | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Models | V2121A | - |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo S10
- Faster processing with Dimensity 1100
- 44W fast charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially better image processing
- May be more expensive than the Edge 20 Fusion
- Software experience may not appeal to all users
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Clean software experience (typical of Motorola)
- Efficient Dimensity 800U for everyday tasks
- Slower processing compared to the S10
- 30W charging is slower than the S10
Display Comparison
While specific display details (resolution, refresh rate) are missing, the core difference lies in the processing power driving the visuals. Both likely utilize AMOLED panels, common in this segment. However, the Dimensity 1100 in the S10 has a more powerful GPU, which translates to smoother graphics rendering in games and potentially better video playback quality. The impact of the chipset on display performance is more significant than minor differences in panel specs.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset plays a crucial role in image processing. The Dimensity 1100’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the S10 will likely result in faster image processing, better noise reduction, and improved dynamic range. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the S10’s chipset provides the computational horsepower to extract more detail and quality from those sensors. We can assume both phones will have a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro/depth sensor, but the S10's processing will be superior.
Performance
The vivo S10’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100, fabricated on a 6nm process, represents a significant step up from the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). The S10’s CPU configuration – 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – offers higher peak clock speeds and utilizes the more efficient Cortex-A78 architecture compared to the Fusion’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster application launches, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The vivo S10’s 44W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W charging. This means significantly faster top-up times, reducing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the S10 mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Users who frequently find themselves needing a quick charge will greatly benefit from the S10’s faster charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S10 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications, enjoy faster app loading times, and value the convenience of 44W fast charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you prioritize a potentially more affordable price, a clean software experience, and are comfortable with slightly less demanding tasks. The Fusion is ideal for everyday use and media consumption.