vivo S10 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco M4 Pro 5G offers exceptional battery life and faster charging, while the vivo S10 Pro boasts a more powerful chipset for smoother performance. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: longevity and value versus raw power and a potentially better camera experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S10 Pro | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 15 | 2021, November 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 22 | Available. Released 2021, November 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.23 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue, Yellow | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | V2121A | 21091116AG, MZB0BGVIN |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1553:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 296721 (v8), 353663 (v9) GeekBench: 1797 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S10 Pro
- More powerful chipset
- Potentially better selfie camera
- Stylish design
- Faster charging (44W)
- Lower battery life compared to Poco
- Charging speed slightly slower than Poco
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
- Exceptional battery life
- Fast charging (33W)
- 5G connectivity
- Excellent value for money
- Less powerful chipset
- Potentially less impressive camera quality
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with a high contrast ratio (1553:1). The Poco M4 Pro 5G measures a slightly higher peak brightness of 510 nits, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The vivo S10 Pro's display is likely to have more accurate color reproduction, but specific details are needed for a definitive comparison. Both likely use AMOLED panels.
Camera Comparison
While both are listed as 'Photo / Video', the vivo S10 Pro is generally known for its stronger selfie camera capabilities, often featuring advanced beauty modes and higher resolution sensors. The Poco M4 Pro 5G likely focuses on versatility with multiple rear lenses. Detailed camera specs and sample images are needed for a more accurate comparison.
Performance
The vivo S10 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 1100 chipset holds a clear advantage over the Poco M4 Pro 5G's Dimensity 810. The Dimensity 1100's Cortex-A78 cores offer significantly better single-core and multi-core performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, gaming, and overall responsiveness. The Poco M4 Pro 5G is still capable, but won't match the S10 Pro's power.
Battery Life
The Poco M4 Pro 5G shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 123h is exceptional, suggesting significantly longer battery life than the vivo S10 Pro. The Poco also offers faster 33W charging, reaching 100% in approximately 59 minutes, compared to the S10 Pro's 44W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S10 Pro? Users prioritizing performance, photography, and a stylish design. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G? Those seeking incredible battery life, fast charging, and a budget-friendly option with 5G connectivity.