vivo S10 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?

The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo S10 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G represent compelling options. The S10 Pro leverages MediaTek's Dimensity 1100, while the Mi 11 Lite 5G opts for Qualcomm's Snapdragon 780G. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing raw processing power and slightly faster charging, the vivo S10 Pro emerges as the winner. However, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s excellent display brightness and proven endurance rating make it a strong contender, especially for media consumption and all-day use.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo S10 Pro Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1x 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China
Launch
Announced2021, July 152021, March 29
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, July 22Available. Released 2021, April 16
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back
Dimensions158.2 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.23 x 2.90 x 0.29 in)160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight173 g (6.10 oz)159 g (5.61 oz)
 -IP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 6
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)
Size6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.90 GHz Kryo 670)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm)Qualcomm SM7350-AB Snapdragon 780G (5 nm)
GPUMali-G77 MC9Adreno 642
OSAndroid 11, OriginOS 1.0Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Main Camera
Dual44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide)-
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single-20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Triple108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Dual44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide)-
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDRHDR, panorama
Single-20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with dual speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging44W wired33W wired, PD3.0, QC4
Type4050 mAhLi-Po 4250 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, White, Gradient Blue, YellowTruffle Black, Mint Green, Citrus Yellow
ModelsV2121AM2101K9G, M2101K9C, M2101K9R
PriceAbout 500 EURAbout 120 EUR
SAR-1.03 W/kg (head)     1.06 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.56 W/kg (head)     0.89 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 106h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -23.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 465534 (v8) | 522490 (v9) GeekBench: 2909 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo S10 Pro

  • Faster 44W charging
  • Potentially higher CPU performance with Dimensity 1100
  • Likely better multitasking capabilities

  • Battery life is unknown, potentially lower than Mi 11 Lite
  • Display brightness information is missing

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

  • Excellent 106-hour endurance rating
  • Bright 846 nit display for outdoor visibility
  • Power-efficient Snapdragon 780G (5nm)

  • Slower 33W charging
  • CPU performance slightly lower than S10 Pro

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 846 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility. While the S10 Pro’s display specs are not provided, the Mi 11 Lite’s high peak brightness translates to a more usable experience in direct sunlight. The Mi 11 Lite also features an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, though this is a common marketing claim. The lack of detailed display information for the S10 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Mi 11 Lite clearly excels in brightness.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive comparison is challenging. However, the absence of specific details suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric flagship. Image processing styles will likely be the differentiating factor, with vivo often favoring brighter, more saturated images, while Xiaomi tends towards a more natural look. The lack of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a significant omission; its presence would be a major advantage for video recording and low-light photography.

Performance

The vivo S10 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) and the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G (5nm) represent different approaches to mid-range performance. The Dimensity 1100’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.6 GHz, offer a performance edge over the Snapdragon 780G’s Kryo 670 cores (max 2.4 GHz). However, the Snapdragon 780G’s 5nm process node provides superior power efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance and thermal management. The S10 Pro’s 6nm node is still efficient, but the 5nm process gives the Mi 11 Lite a slight advantage in long-term stability under load. The S10 Pro will likely show a lead in benchmark scores, but real-world gains may be less pronounced.

Battery Life

The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s 106-hour endurance rating is a standout feature, indicating excellent battery life. While the vivo S10 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 44W wired charging is faster than the Mi 11 Lite’s 33W charging, which also supports PD3.0 and QC4. This means the S10 Pro can potentially replenish its battery more quickly, even if its capacity is smaller. The Mi 11 Lite’s endurance rating suggests a more efficient power draw, potentially offsetting the charging speed difference for users who prioritize all-day battery life.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo S10 Pro if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications and multitasking with ease, and if you value the potential for slightly quicker charging times. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G if you prioritize a vibrant, bright display for media consumption, and if long battery life is a critical requirement, as its 106-hour endurance rating suggests a more efficient power profile.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Dimensity 1100 in the vivo S10 Pro get noticeably hotter than the Snapdragon 780G during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 1100 offers higher peak performance, the Snapdragon 780G’s 5nm process is more efficient. This suggests the Mi 11 Lite 5G is likely to maintain cooler temperatures during prolonged gaming, potentially reducing thermal throttling and ensuring more consistent frame rates. However, the S10 Pro’s cooling solution (which is not specified) could mitigate this difference.
❓ How much faster is the 44W charging on the vivo S10 Pro compared to the 33W charging on the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G?
The 44W charging on the S10 Pro will likely result in a faster 0-100% charge time. While exact figures depend on battery capacity, expect a difference of approximately 15-30 minutes. The Mi 11 Lite 5G’s support for PD3.0 and QC4 ensures compatibility with a wider range of chargers, but it won’t match the S10 Pro’s peak charging speed.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a sign of a weak camera system?
Not necessarily, but it’s concerning. The absence of sensor size, aperture, and OIS information suggests neither phone is targeting the camera-focused segment. Both are likely to offer adequate image quality for casual use, but won’t compete with phones boasting larger sensors and advanced features.