The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo S10 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite are two strong contenders. Both offer stylish designs and compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo S10 Pro boasts a significantly more powerful chipset and faster charging, making it ideal for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite shines with its exceptional display brightness and long-lasting battery, appealing to those prioritizing media consumption and all-day use. Ultimately, the S10 Pro offers better performance, while the Mi 11 Lite prioritizes battery and display.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 15 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 22 | Available. Released 2021, April 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.23 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 157 g (5.54 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue, Yellow | Boba Black (Vinyl Black), Peach Pink (Tuscany Coral), Bubblegum Blue (Jazz Blue) |
| Models | V2121A | M2101K9AG, M2101K9AI |
| Price | About 500 EUR | £ 221.40 / € 106.34 |
| SAR | - | 1.07 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 290172 (v8), 294251 (v9)
GeekBench: 1796 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S10 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset
- Fast 44W charging
- Likely excellent selfie camera
- Stylish design
- Battery life may not be as long as Mi 11 Lite
- Display brightness not as high as Mi 11 Lite
- Camera performance details are limited
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
- Exceptional display brightness (826 nits)
- Long-lasting battery life (100h endurance)
- Slim and lightweight design
- Versatile camera system
- Less powerful chipset than vivo S10 Pro
- Slower 33W charging
- Performance may struggle with demanding games
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite takes the display crown with its impressive 826 nits peak brightness, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo S10 Pro has a good display, it doesn't match the Mi 11 Lite's brightness. The Mi 11 Lite's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors, further enhancing the viewing experience. The S10 Pro likely has a good AMOLED panel, but lacks the measured brightness data to compete.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the specifics are less clear without detailed camera reviews. The Mi 11 Lite is known for its versatile camera setup, offering good image quality in various conditions. The vivo S10 Pro typically emphasizes selfie camera capabilities, often featuring advanced features and high megapixel counts. A direct comparison would require detailed testing and sample images.
Performance
Here, the vivo S10 Pro pulls ahead. The Mediatek Dimensity 1100 chipset is considerably more powerful than the Snapdragon 732G in the Mi 11 Lite. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The S10 Pro's CPU configuration (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78) is designed for high performance, while the Mi 11 Lite's CPU is more focused on efficiency.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite boasts an impressive endurance rating of 100 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. While the vivo S10 Pro's 44W charging is faster, the Mi 11 Lite's larger battery capacity likely allows it to last longer on a single charge. The S10 Pro's battery capacity is likely around 4000-4500mAh, while the Mi 11 Lite is likely around 4250mAh.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S10 Pro? Gamers, content creators, and users who demand smooth performance and fast charging. Who should buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite? Users who prioritize a vibrant display, long battery life, and a slim, lightweight design for everyday use and media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo S10 Pro is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite offers superior battery life with its 100-hour endurance rating.
❓ Is the vivo S10 Pro worth the extra cost?
If performance is your top priority, the vivo S10 Pro is worth the extra cost. However, if you value battery life and a bright display, the Mi 11 Lite is a compelling alternative.
