The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo S10 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A72 are two strong contenders. Both offer appealing features, but cater to slightly different needs. This in-depth comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo S10 Pro boasts a significantly faster chipset and quicker charging, making it ideal for gamers and power users. However, the Galaxy A72 shines with its exceptional battery life and brighter display. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities: performance or endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 15 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 22 | Available. Released 2021, March 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.23 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.05 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue, Yellow | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | V2121A | SM-A725F, SM-A725F/DS, SM-A725M, SM-A725M/DS |
| Price | About 500 EUR | £ 174.89 / € 359.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.23 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 117h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 279342 (v8)
GeekBench: 6483 (v4.4), 1627 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S10 Pro
- Faster Processor (Dimensity 1100)
- Faster Charging (44W)
- Good Selfie Camera
- Likely Smoother Display Refresh Rate
- Battery Life Not as Good as A72
- Camera versatility potentially lower
- Samsung Ecosystem Integration Missing
Samsung Galaxy A72
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Brighter Display
- Samsung Ecosystem Integration
- Versatile Camera System
- Slower Processor (Snapdragon 720G)
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Display not as bright as A72
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A72 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 825 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo S10 Pro has a good quality AMOLED display, it doesn't reach the same brightness levels. The A72's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors, further enhancing the viewing experience. The S10 Pro likely has a smoother refresh rate, though specific details are needed.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Galaxy A72 likely has a more versatile setup with potentially better image processing thanks to Samsung's established camera software. The S10 Pro is known for its selfie camera capabilities, often featuring advanced beauty modes and features geared towards social media. Detailed camera specs and sample images are needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
Here, the vivo S10 Pro pulls ahead. The Mediatek Dimensity 1100 chipset is considerably more powerful than the Snapdragon 720G in the Galaxy A72. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly better gaming performance on the S10 Pro. The Dimensity 1100's 6nm process also contributes to better power efficiency despite the higher performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A72 is the clear winner in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 117 hours. This translates to multiple days of use on a single charge. The vivo S10 Pro, while having a decent battery, won't match the A72's longevity. The A72's slower 25W charging is a trade-off for the extended battery life.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S10 Pro? Gamers, social media enthusiasts, and those prioritizing performance and fast charging. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A72? Users who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and the reliability of the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo S10 Pro is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset.
❓ Does the Galaxy A72 have a good camera?
Yes, the Galaxy A72 has a versatile camera system and benefits from Samsung's image processing, making it a solid choice for photography.
