vivo S10 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and faster charging, the vivo S10 Pro is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1100 chipset offers a slight edge in CPU performance, and the 44W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Galaxy A52s 5G remains a strong contender with its reliable battery life and well-regarded camera system.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S10 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 15 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 22 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.23 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue, Yellow | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | V2121A | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 500 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S10 Pro
- Faster 44W wired charging
- Potentially higher CPU performance with Dimensity 1100
- Modern chipset architecture
- Battery capacity not specified
- Camera details are limited
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Excellent 113-hour battery endurance
- 800 nits peak brightness for outdoor visibility
- Proven camera performance and reliability
- Slower 25W charging
- CPU clock speeds are lower than the S10 Pro
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in bright outdoor conditions. While the vivo S10 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, Samsung’s panel offers an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both devices likely utilize AMOLED technology, common in this price bracket, but the A52s 5G’s confirmed brightness gives it a clear advantage for outdoor usability. The lack of refresh rate information for the S10 Pro is a notable omission, potentially impacting smoothness compared to the A52s 5G if it lacks a high refresh rate panel.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but specific details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the A52s 5G’s reputation for consistent image quality and reliable autofocus gives it an edge. The S10 Pro’s camera performance will likely depend heavily on its image processing algorithms. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are included for marketing purposes rather than significant photographic utility. Focusing on the main sensor and image processing is crucial for assessing real-world camera performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo S10 Pro features the Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) with a CPU configuration of 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) with a CPU of 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 1100’s higher clock speeds on its primary cores suggest a performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the Snapdragon 778G is known for its efficient power consumption and optimized GPU performance. Both are built on a 6nm process, indicating comparable efficiency, but the S10 Pro’s CPU architecture leans towards raw processing power.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G achieves an impressive endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The vivo S10 Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 44W wired charging significantly surpasses the A52s 5G’s 25W charging. This means the S10 Pro can replenish its battery much faster, mitigating any potential capacity disadvantage. While the A52s 5G excels in longevity, the S10 Pro prioritizes convenience with its quicker charging times, allowing users to spend less time tethered to a wall outlet.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S10 Pro if you need faster charging speeds and a more powerful processor for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming. You'll benefit from quicker app loading times and a more responsive user experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you prioritize long-lasting battery life and a consistently reliable camera experience, especially if you frequently capture photos and videos throughout the day.