vivo S10 Pro vs Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster charging (65W vs 44W), slightly more powerful chipset (Dimensity 1200 Max), and generally more refined software experience. However, the vivo S10 Pro might appeal to those prioritizing selfie camera quality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S10 Pro | Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 41, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 15 | 2021, November 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 22 | Available. Released 2021, December 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Panda Glass) |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.23 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 158.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | RGB notification lights around the camera island | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 920 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 3.0 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | ARM G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue, Yellow | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue, Gold, League of Legends |
| Models | V2121A | PFDM00, CPH2293 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 400 EUR |
vivo S10 Pro
- Excellent selfie camera
- Stylish design
- Good display
- Decent performance
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Reno7 Pro
- Potentially less versatile rear camera
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
- Fast 65W charging
- More powerful chipset
- Versatile rear camera system
- Premium design and build quality
- Selfie camera may not be as impressive as S10 Pro
- Software experience can be polarizing for some
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with high refresh rates (likely 90Hz or 120Hz, though specific refresh rates need confirmation). The Reno7 Pro 5G likely has a slightly brighter display and potentially a higher resolution, offering a more vibrant and detailed viewing experience. Color accuracy should be excellent on both.
Camera Comparison
The vivo S10 Pro is heavily marketed for its selfie camera capabilities, likely featuring a high-resolution front-facing sensor and advanced beauty modes. The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G boasts a versatile rear camera system, potentially including a main sensor, ultrawide lens, and telephoto lens, offering more flexibility for different shooting scenarios. Low-light performance is likely better on the Reno7 Pro 5G.
Performance
The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G's Dimensity 1200 Max chipset provides a noticeable performance edge over the vivo S10 Pro's Dimensity 1100. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno7 Pro 5G. Both phones should handle everyday tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G's 65W fast charging is a significant advantage, allowing for incredibly quick top-ups. The vivo S10 Pro's 44W charging is still respectable, but considerably slower. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 4500-5000mAh) on both devices, so the Reno7 Pro 5G's faster charging translates to a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
The vivo S10 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize a strong selfie camera and a sleek design. The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G is a better choice for those seeking faster charging, smoother performance, and a more premium overall experience.