vivo S10 Pro vs Motorola Edge 20 Fusion: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the vivo S10 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U. However, the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers seeking a well-rounded experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S10 Pro | Motorola Edge 20 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 15 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 22 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.23 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue, Yellow | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Models | V2121A | - |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo S10 Pro
- Faster processor (Dimensity 1100)
- Faster charging (44W)
- Potentially better image processing
- May be more expensive
- Potentially less battery life if battery capacity is smaller
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- More affordable
- Good overall performance for everyday tasks
- Efficient Dimensity 800U chipset
- Slower processor
- Slower charging
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics, but given the market positioning, we can infer differences. The S10 Pro, being a more recent release, likely benefits from a slightly higher peak brightness and potentially a more color-accurate panel. Motorola typically prioritizes color accuracy in this segment. The Edge 20 Fusion likely uses a 90Hz panel, a common feature for smoother scrolling, while the S10 Pro may or may not have a high refresh rate. Bezels are likely comparable, with both aiming for a modern, immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis relies on brand tendencies. Vivo typically emphasizes selfie cameras, so the S10 Pro likely has a more advanced front-facing setup. The rear camera systems are likely comparable in terms of overall quality, but the S10 Pro may benefit from the more powerful ISP within the Dimensity 1100, enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. Both phones likely include standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses, but the S10 Pro’s chipset could offer more sophisticated computational photography features.
Performance
The vivo S10 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). The Dimensity 1100 features a more powerful CPU configuration – four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz versus the Edge 20 Fusion’s two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1100 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the 7nm Dimensity 800U is efficient, it simply can't match the raw processing power of its counterpart.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified, but the charging wattage difference is significant. The vivo S10 Pro’s 44W wired charging is considerably faster than the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W charging. This means the S10 Pro can replenish its battery from 0-100% in a shorter timeframe, a crucial advantage for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost. Even with a slightly smaller battery, the faster charging could offset the difference in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S10 Pro if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications with ease, and if minimizing charging downtime is a priority. Its superior chipset and 44W charging make it ideal for power users. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you prefer a more balanced package with a focus on value. It’s a great choice for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming, offering a solid experience without breaking the bank.