The vivo S1 and Huawei P30 lite New Edition represent compelling options in the competitive sub-₹20,000 smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a balanced experience, but they achieve this through different approaches to chipset selection and feature prioritization. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which phone offers the most value for everyday users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly more modern chipset architecture, the vivo S1 emerges as the better choice. Its Helio P65, while not a flagship, offers a more efficient Cortex-A75 based core configuration than the P30 lite's Kirin 710, translating to smoother multitasking and app loading.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - Asia | 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 20, 38 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July 17. Released 2019, July | 2020, January 14. Released 2020, January 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 152.9 x 72.7 x 7.4 mm (6.02 x 2.86 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 152.9 g (5.40 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2312 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.15 inches, 93.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 (12 nm) | Kirin 710 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, EMUI 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3340 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Diamond Black, Skyline Blue, Cosmic Green | Peacock Blue, Midnight Black, Pearl White, Breathing Crystal |
| Models | 1907, V1907, 1907_19, V1913A | Marie-L21BX, MAR-LX2B, HWV33 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 4GB RAM | ₹ 17,200 | - |
| 128GB 6GB RAM | ₹ 17,200 | - |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | ₹ 17,990 | - |
vivo S1
- More modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A75)
- Option for 128GB storage
- Potentially better power efficiency
- Brand recognition may be lower than Huawei
- Camera performance details are unknown
Huawei P30 lite New Edition
- Familiar Huawei user interface
- Established brand reputation
- Potentially optimized software experience
- Older CPU architecture (Cortex-A73)
- May exhibit slightly slower app loading times
- Limited storage options
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. While specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable, the focus here is on the processors. Display quality will likely be similar, with both offering adequate viewing angles and color reproduction for everyday use. Bezels are expected to be moderate, typical of phones in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are lacking for both devices. However, given the market positioning, it’s safe to assume both will feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, an ultrawide lens, and potentially a depth sensor. The image processing algorithms will likely differ, with Huawei historically emphasizing vibrant, sometimes oversaturated colors, while vivo tends towards a more natural look. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the processing capabilities of the chipset will play a role in image quality and speed.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo S1’s Mediatek Helio P65 utilizes a dual-cluster configuration with 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture provides a performance boost in single-core tasks and improved efficiency compared to the Huawei P30 lite New Edition’s Kirin 710, which features 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. While the Kirin 710’s A73 cores have a higher clock speed, the A75 cores in the Helio P65 offer superior IPC (Instructions Per Clock), leading to better overall responsiveness. Both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, suggesting similar power efficiency, but the architectural advantage favors the vivo S1.
Battery Life
Both the vivo S1 and Huawei P30 lite New Edition support 18W wired charging, a standard offering in this price range. While battery capacity isn’t specified for the P30 lite New Edition, the charging speed suggests a comparable battery size to the vivo S1. Expect a full charge to take around 1.5 to 2 hours. The Helio P65’s slightly more efficient architecture in the vivo S1 *may* translate to marginally better battery life during sustained use, but real-world usage patterns will be the deciding factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S1 if you need a phone that handles everyday tasks and moderate gaming with a bit more responsiveness, and appreciate the option of 128GB storage. Buy the Huawei P30 lite New Edition if you prefer the Huawei ecosystem and user interface, and are less concerned with raw processing power, focusing more on a familiar software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P65 in the vivo S1 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio P65 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low for a smooth experience. The Kirin 710 in the P30 lite New Edition will offer similar performance, but the P65’s architecture may provide slightly more consistent frame rates.
❓ Does the Huawei P30 lite New Edition still receive software updates and security patches?
Huawei’s software update situation is complex. While the P30 lite New Edition may receive some security patches, major Android version updates are less likely due to ongoing geopolitical factors. The vivo S1’s update schedule will depend on vivo’s commitment to the device.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture between the Helio P65 and Kirin 710 noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is noticeable in tasks like app launching, multitasking, and scrolling through demanding websites. The Helio P65’s Cortex-A75 cores provide a performance edge over the Kirin 710’s Cortex-A73 cores, resulting in a snappier user experience.
