The vivo S1 Pro and Oppo Reno2 F represent a fascinating intersection in the mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aimed to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they took different approaches, primarily in their chipset choices. This comparison dissects those choices, focusing on how the Snapdragon 665 in the S1 Pro stacks up against the Helio P70 in the Reno2 F, and how those differences translate to everyday use.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing quick top-ups and slightly better sustained performance, the Oppo Reno2 F is the stronger choice. Its 20W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Helio P70, while built on a slightly larger node, offers a marginal performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the S1 Pro remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November 19. Released 2019, November | 2019, August 28. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 162.4 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.7 g (6.60 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.3", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 350 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 14 h (3G) |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Knight Black, Fancy Sky | Sky White, Lake Green |
| Models | 1920, PD1945F_EX, 1920_20 | CPH1989 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 340 EUR |
vivo S1 Pro
- Generally more affordable price point.
- Efficient Snapdragon 665 chipset.
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Slightly less powerful CPU compared to the Reno2 F.
- Potentially less refined image processing.
Oppo Reno2 F
- Faster 20W wired charging.
- Slightly more powerful Helio P70 CPU.
- Potentially better image processing capabilities.
- Typically costs slightly more than the S1 Pro.
- Helio P70 built on a larger 12nm process.
- May not offer a significant performance leap in all scenarios.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The key difference lies in the underlying silicon driving them. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) aren't provided, the chipset's image signal processor (ISP) impacts image quality. The Reno2 F's Helio P70 likely offers slightly better image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in more vibrant colors and sharper details, though this is a subtle difference. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of phones in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the quality hinges on sensor size and image processing. The Helio P70's ISP in the Reno2 F likely provides more advanced image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. It's reasonable to assume both phones include a primary sensor, an ultrawide, and a depth sensor. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would be a significant advantage, but is not specified for either device. The marketing often focuses on megapixel count, but sensor size and pixel binning are more crucial for image quality.
Performance
The core of the comparison lies in the chipsets. The vivo S1 Pro's Snapdragon 665 (11nm) features a Kryo CPU architecture, offering a balance of performance and efficiency. Its octa-core configuration (4x2.0 GHz + 4x1.8 GHz) is designed for smooth multitasking. However, the Oppo Reno2 F's Helio P70 (12nm) utilizes Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.1 GHz, providing a slight edge in single-core performance. The 12nm process, while larger than the Snapdragon's 11nm, doesn't necessarily translate to significantly worse efficiency. In real-world use, the Reno2 F will likely feel snappier when launching apps and switching between them. Gaming performance will be similar, with both capable of handling most popular titles at medium settings, but the Reno2 F may exhibit slightly less frame rate drop during prolonged sessions.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified, but both phones likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The critical difference is charging speed. The vivo S1 Pro supports 18W wired charging, while the Oppo Reno2 F boasts 20W. This 2W difference translates to a noticeable reduction in charging time. The Reno2 F will likely reach a full charge significantly faster, a major convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery. While both phones should offer all-day battery life with moderate use, the Reno2 F's faster charging mitigates the impact of heavy usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S1 Pro if you prioritize a balance of features at the lowest possible price point and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications or extended gaming sessions. Buy the Oppo Reno2 F if you value faster charging speeds, slightly improved CPU performance for multitasking, and are willing to spend a little more for a smoother overall experience. The Reno2 F is better suited for users who frequently find themselves needing to quickly replenish their battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P70 in the Oppo Reno2 F overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Helio P70 is a capable chipset, its 12nm process isn't as thermally efficient as some newer chips. However, Oppo typically implements thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating. Expect some throttling during extended gaming, but it shouldn't be severe enough to render the phone unusable. The Reno2 F's slightly better CPU performance may also mean it completes tasks faster, reducing the overall thermal load.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 18W and 20W really noticeable in the Oppo Reno2 F?
Yes, the 2W difference is surprisingly impactful. 20W charging allows the Reno2 F to replenish its battery significantly faster than the S1 Pro's 18W charging. You'll likely see a 15-20% reduction in total charging time, which can be a lifesaver when you're short on time. This is especially beneficial for users who frequently use their phones throughout the day.
❓ Does either phone support VoLTE or Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)?
Given the release timeframe and market segment of both devices, it's highly probable that both the vivo S1 Pro and Oppo Reno2 F support VoLTE for improved call quality and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) for faster wireless internet speeds. However, specific carrier compatibility should be verified before purchase.
