vivo S1 Pro vs OnePlus 7T Pro 5G: A Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing everyday tasks and battery life, the vivo S1 Pro offers a compelling value. However, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is the clear winner for power users, gamers, and those demanding significantly faster performance thanks to its superior Snapdragon 855+ chipset and 30W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S1 Pro | OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 71 SA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, November 19. Released 2019, November | 2019, October 23. Released 2019, November 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.7 g (6.60 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~516 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4085 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Knight Black, Fancy Sky | Papaya Orange |
| Models | 1920, PD1945F_EX, 1920_20 | HD1925 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 800 EUR |
vivo S1 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Stylish design
- Decent battery life for basic use
- Significantly slower performance
- Slower charging speeds
- Inferior camera capabilities
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 855+
- 30W Warp Charge for fast charging
- Superior camera quality and features
- Higher price
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- Older device, may have limited software updates
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature LCD panels (data unavailable for S1 Pro), the core difference lies in their processing power, impacting UI smoothness. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 855+ will deliver a noticeably more fluid experience when scrolling and navigating the interface. We can assume the 7T Pro 5G has a higher peak brightness and potentially better color accuracy given its flagship positioning, though specific nit values are unknown. Bezels are likely comparable, typical for phones of this era.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information for the vivo S1 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G, being a higher-tier device, likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing. The 855+’s image signal processor (ISP) is also more capable, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. While the S1 Pro may suffice for casual photography, the 7T Pro 5G will deliver superior image quality, especially in challenging conditions. We can safely assume the 7T Pro 5G has OIS, a feature likely absent on the S1 Pro.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) is a significant leap over the vivo S1 Pro’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 855+ features a Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.96 GHz, compared to the S1 Pro’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold core. This translates to roughly 40-50% faster CPU performance and a dramatically improved GPU. The 7nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers and multi-taskers will overwhelmingly benefit from the 7T Pro 5G.
Battery Life
The vivo S1 Pro’s 18W charging is significantly slower than the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s 30W Warp Charge. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the 7T Pro 5G means less downtime. A full charge on the 7T Pro 5G will likely take around 60-70 minutes, while the S1 Pro could take over 2 hours. The Snapdragon 855+’s efficiency, despite its higher performance, can partially offset the potential battery life difference, especially during moderate usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S1 Pro if you need a stylish, reliable smartphone for basic tasks like social media, calls, and light web browsing, and prioritize a lower price point. Buy the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren if you prefer a smoother, faster experience for demanding apps, gaming, and benefit from 5G connectivity, and are willing to spend more for flagship-level performance.