The Honor View 20 and vivo S1 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The View 20, released with a flagship Kirin 980 chipset, aimed to deliver premium performance at a competitive price. The S1 Pro, leveraging the Snapdragon 665, focused on a balance of features and affordability. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device offers the best value in today's market.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Honor View 20 is the clear winner. Its Kirin 980 chipset provides a significant performance advantage over the Snapdragon 665 in the S1 Pro. However, the S1 Pro remains a viable option for casual users seeking a reliable and affordable device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November 19. Released 2019, November | 2018, December. Released 2018, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 156.9 x 75.4 x 8.1 mm (6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.7 g (6.60 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Yes |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2310 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 101.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Kirin 980 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, Magic UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Panorama, HDR, LED flash |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@960fps, (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 27mm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 22.5W wired, 55% in 30 min (International)
18W wired (India) |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Knight Black, Fancy Sky | Saphire Blue, Phantom Blue, Phantom Red, Midnight Black |
| Models | 1920, PD1945F_EX, 1920_20 | PCT-AL10, PCT-TL10, PCT-L29 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.1dB / Crosstalk -64.5dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (1313), 3.597 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 68dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 82dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 275413 (v7)
GeekBench: 9530 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S1 Pro
- More powerful Kirin 980 chipset
- Faster 22.5W charging (International)
- Potentially superior camera system
- May be harder to find new
- Software support may be limited
Honor View 20
- More affordable price point
- Reliable Snapdragon 665 performance for basic tasks
- Good battery life
- Significantly slower performance than the View 20
- Slower 18W charging
Display Comparison
Both phones share an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (1313:1) and a respectable 3.597 sunlight readability score, suggesting similar visual experiences in bright conditions. However, the context data lacks specifics on panel technology (LCD vs OLED) or resolution for the S1 Pro. The View 20’s display benefits from its higher contrast, making blacks appear deeper and colors more vibrant. Without further details on the S1 Pro’s panel, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the View 20.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited to 'Photo / Video' capabilities. However, given the View 20’s positioning as a flagship-adjacent device, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and advanced image processing algorithms. The S1 Pro, targeting a lower price point, likely employs a more basic camera setup. Without specific sensor details, it’s reasonable to assume the View 20 captures more detailed images with better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess video stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The Kirin 980 (7nm) in the Honor View 20 represents a substantial leap in processing power compared to the Snapdragon 665 (11nm) found in the vivo S1 Pro. The Kirin 980’s octa-core configuration, featuring two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores, delivers significantly faster CPU speeds (2.6 GHz) and a more efficient architecture. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience, particularly noticeable in demanding applications and games. The Snapdragon 665, while capable, is geared towards everyday tasks and will likely exhibit more lag when pushed to its limits. The 7nm process node of the Kirin 980 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an Endurance rating of 96 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Honor View 20’s 22.5W wired charging (international variant) offers a faster charging experience than the S1 Pro’s 18W charging. The View 20 can achieve 55% charge in just 30 minutes, while the S1 Pro will take longer. The India variant of the View 20 also has 18W charging, so the difference is regional. While both phones offer all-day battery life for moderate users, the View 20’s faster charging provides greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S1 Pro if you need a dependable daily driver for basic tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing, and prioritize affordability. Buy the Honor View 20 if you prefer a smoother experience with demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, and value a more capable camera system, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Kirin 980 in the Honor View 20 prone to overheating during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Kirin 980 is a powerful chipset, it was known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained heavy load. However, the View 20’s design included a liquid cooling system to mitigate this issue, providing a reasonably stable gaming experience. It won't match modern flagships, but it's significantly better than the S1 Pro.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 665 in the vivo S1 Pro handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 665 can run PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a smooth frame rate. Expect occasional stuttering and lag, especially during intense firefights. It's suitable for casual gaming, but not ideal for competitive players.
❓ Does the Honor View 20 support fast software updates and security patches?
Honor's software support has been inconsistent. The View 20 is unlikely to receive major Android version updates at this point, and security patches may be infrequent. This is a significant drawback compared to brands with more robust software support policies.
❓ What type of charging port do both phones use?
Both the Honor View 20 and the vivo S1 Pro utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer. This is a standard connection, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of accessories.
