The vivo S1 Pro (China variant) and the Realme X50m 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded mid-range 5G smartphone space. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their respective Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Realme X50m 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 765G offers a substantial performance uplift over the S1 Pro’s Snapdragon 675, coupled with significantly faster 30W charging. While the S1 Pro may appeal to those on a tighter budget, the X50m 5G provides a more robust and enjoyable user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, May. Released 2019, May | 2020, April 23. Released 2020, April 29 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 157.3 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.19 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | 3700 mAh, non-removable | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Red, Midsummer dream | Starry Blue, Galaxy White |
| Models | V1832A, V1832T | - |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo S1 Pro (China)
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Adequate for basic tasks
- Significantly slower performance
- Slower 18W charging
- Less efficient chipset
Realme X50m 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 765G processor
- 30W fast charging (70% in 30 min)
- More efficient 7nm process
- Integrated 5G modem
- Potentially higher price
- May require more frequent software updates
- No standout display features
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like OLED vs. LCD) are missing, the focus here is on the underlying performance. The Realme X50m 5G’s chipset will likely contribute to smoother scrolling and animations, even if the panel technology is similar. The absence of high refresh rate information suggests both are likely 60Hz, meaning the chipset’s ability to drive the UI is more critical.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s image signal processor (ISP) is more advanced, offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. The S1 Pro’s ISP, while adequate, will likely produce less refined images, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of OIS information suggests neither phone prioritizes advanced stabilization, relying more on software processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50m 5G’s Snapdragon 765G, built on a 7nm process, represents a significant leap over the vivo S1 Pro’s 11nm Snapdragon 675. The 765G’s Kryo 475 Prime core (2.4GHz) provides a substantial single-core performance advantage, while its integrated 5G modem offers native 5G connectivity. The S1 Pro relies on the older 675, which, while capable, will struggle with demanding tasks and lacks integrated 5G, potentially relying on a slower external modem. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience on the X50m 5G.
Battery Life
The Realme X50m 5G’s 30W charging is a game-changer. The claim of 70% charge in 30 minutes significantly reduces downtime compared to the vivo S1 Pro’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The more efficient 7nm process of the 765G also contributes to better battery life under load, further favoring the X50m 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S1 Pro (China) if you need a functional 5G device on an extremely limited budget and are willing to compromise on performance and charging speed. Buy the Realme X50m 5G if you prioritize smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and significantly faster charging, making it a more future-proof investment despite a potentially higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 675 in the vivo S1 Pro struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 675 will likely struggle with PUBG Mobile at higher settings. You’ll need to lower the graphics and frame rate to achieve a playable experience, and even then, expect occasional frame drops. The Snapdragon 765G in the Realme X50m 5G offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 30W charging on the Realme X50m 5G compared to the 18W charging on the vivo S1 Pro in real-world use?
The Realme X50m 5G’s 30W charging can realistically add around 50% battery life in 30 minutes, while the vivo S1 Pro’s 18W charging will likely only add around 30% in the same timeframe. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Realme X50m 5G support standalone (SA) 5G networks, and is it compatible with all 5G bands?
The Snapdragon 765G supports both standalone (SA) and non-standalone (NSA) 5G networks. However, band compatibility varies by region. You’ll need to check with your carrier to ensure the Realme X50m 5G supports the 5G bands deployed in your area.
