OnePlus 8T+ 5G vs vivo S1 Pro: A Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 offers a substantial leap in processing power and gaming capabilities. However, the vivo S1 Pro remains a viable option for budget-conscious users who prioritize efficiency and don't demand top-tier performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S1 Pro (China) | OnePlus 8T+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, May. Released 2019, May | 2020, October 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, October 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.3 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.19 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 160.7 x 74.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (market dependant) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 39 min |
| Type | 3700 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Red, Midsummer dream | Aquamarine Green, Lunar Silver |
| Models | V1832A, V1832T | KB2007 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 640 EUR |
vivo S1 Pro (China)
- Significantly faster performance with Snapdragon 865
- Ultra-fast 65W charging (0-100% in 39 minutes)
- Superior gaming capabilities
- More advanced image processing
- Higher price point
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load
OnePlus 8T+ 5G
- More affordable price
- Good battery life for basic usage
- Efficient Snapdragon 675 processor
- Sufficient for everyday tasks
- Significantly slower performance
- Slow 18W charging
- Limited gaming capabilities
- Inferior camera performance in low light
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided for the vivo S1 Pro, it's reasonable to assume it utilizes an AMOLED panel common in its price bracket. However, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s display benefits from the more powerful image signal processor (ISP) of the Snapdragon 865, potentially leading to more accurate color reproduction. The 8T+’s panel likely features a higher refresh rate (120Hz) than the S1 Pro, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. The difference in processing power impacts the display's ability to handle complex visual tasks.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the vivo S1 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 865 in the OnePlus 8T+ 5G enables more advanced image processing capabilities, including better low-light performance and faster autofocus. The 865’s ISP supports higher resolution sensors and more complex computational photography algorithms. While the S1 Pro may offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, the 8T+ 5G will likely excel in challenging scenarios. The 8T+’s ISP also supports 4K video recording at higher frame rates.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is significantly more powerful than the vivo S1 Pro’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The 865 features a more advanced CPU architecture – a Cortex-A77 prime core versus the 675’s Kryo 460 Gold – and a substantially more capable Adreno 650 GPU compared to the Adreno 618. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience on the OnePlus. The 7nm+ process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling under sustained load. The 675 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games or demanding applications.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s 65W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, delivering a full charge in just 39 minutes. The vivo S1 Pro’s 18W charging is considerably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Snapdragon 865’s more efficient architecture, despite its higher performance, can partially offset the power draw. The faster charging of the 8T+ 5G significantly reduces downtime, making it more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S1 Pro (China) if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks, social media, and light gaming, and value battery life and affordability above all else. Buy the OnePlus 8T+ 5G if you prefer a smoother, faster experience for demanding apps, mobile gaming, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast 65W charging, even if it comes at a higher price point.