vivo S1 Prime vs Oppo Reno 5G: A Detailed Performance and Value Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing smooth performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Reno 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855 offers a substantial leap in processing power over the S1 Prime’s Snapdragon 665. However, if budget is the primary concern and basic tasks are your focus, the S1 Prime remains a viable option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S1 Prime | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 12. Released 2020, August 12 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190.2 g (6.70 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Blue, Jade Black | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | V1937 | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 880 EUR |
vivo S1 Prime
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful chipset
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Reno 5G
- Less capable camera system
- May struggle with demanding games and applications
Oppo Reno 5G
- Much faster performance thanks to the Snapdragon 855
- Superior camera capabilities
- Faster charging speeds (20W vs 18W)
- Higher price compared to the S1 Prime
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- Older device, may receive fewer software updates
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the S1 Prime's positioning, it likely features an LCD panel with a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The Reno 5G, being a slightly higher-tier device, may have an AMOLED display, offering superior contrast and color accuracy. The Reno 5G's age also suggests a potential for a higher peak brightness, improving visibility in direct sunlight. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting design trends of their respective release periods.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Reno 5G, being a more premium device, likely incorporates a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Snapdragon 855’s image signal processor (ISP) is also more advanced, enabling better dynamic range and low-light performance. The S1 Prime likely relies on software processing to compensate for its less capable hardware. The inclusion of 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device is largely marketing fluff and shouldn't heavily influence purchasing decisions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 5G’s Snapdragon 855, built on a 7nm process, significantly outperforms the vivo S1 Prime’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 855 features a Kryo 485 CPU with a prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, compared to the S1 Prime’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold core. This translates to a noticeable difference in app loading times, multitasking smoothness, and gaming performance. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling under sustained load. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the 855’s superior architecture will leverage it more effectively.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Snapdragon 855’s 7nm process offers better power efficiency than the Snapdragon 665’s 11nm process. The Oppo Reno 5G also supports 20W wired charging, slightly faster than the S1 Prime’s 18W charging. This means the Reno 5G can potentially achieve a full charge in a shorter timeframe, even if the battery capacity is similar. Real-world battery life will depend on usage patterns, but the Reno 5G’s more efficient chipset gives it an advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S1 Prime if you need a highly affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing. It’s ideal for users who prioritize battery life over raw performance. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, especially when multitasking, gaming, or using demanding applications. It’s the better choice for users who want a phone that will remain capable for longer.