vivo Pad5 vs Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024): A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging

The Android tablet market is heating up, with both vivo and Huawei offering compelling options. The vivo Pad5, powered by the cutting-edge Mediatek Dimensity 9300+, aims for raw performance, while the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024) leverages the Kirin 9000S, focusing on a balanced experience within Huawei’s ecosystem. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right tablet for your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the vivo Pad5 is the better choice. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset, built on a 4nm process, delivers a significant performance advantage over the 7nm Kirin 9000S. While the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024) boasts faster 66W charging, the vivo Pad5’s superior processing power is more impactful for demanding tasks.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo Pad5 Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024)
Network
2G bandsN/AN/A
3G bandsN/AN/A
4G bandsN/AN/A
EDGENoNo
GPRSNoNo
TechnologyNo cellular connectivityNo cellular connectivity
Launch
Announced2025, May 292023, November 28
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, June 06Available. Released 2023, December 18
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame-
Dimensions266.4 x 192 x 6.6 mm (10.49 x 7.56 x 0.26 in)249.2 x 160.4 x 5.9 mm (9.81 x 6.31 x 0.23 in)
SIMNoNo
Weight590 g (1.30 lb)449 g g cellular model) (15.84 oz)
Display
Resolution1968 x 2800 pixels (~283 ppi density)2560 x 1600 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density)
Size12.1 inches, 444.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio)11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~87.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 900 nits (peak)OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)Octa-core (1x2.49 GHz Taishan Big & 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid & 4x1.53GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm)Kirin 9000S (7 nm)
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Maleoon 910 MP4
OSAndroid 15, OriginOS 5 HDHarmonyOS 4.0
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual-13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single8 MP-
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP16 MP, f/2.2
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers)Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers)
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningUnspecifiedGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG, magnetic connectorUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyroAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Battery
Charging44W wired, PD 5W reverse wired66W wired 5W reverse wired
Type10000 mAhLi-Po 8300 mAh
Misc
ColorsGray, Blue, PinkGray, Blue, White, Black
Models-XYAO-W00
PriceAbout 310 EURAbout 540 EUR

vivo Pad5

  • Superior processing power with Dimensity 9300+
  • More efficient 4nm manufacturing process
  • Better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency

  • Slower charging speed (44W vs 66W)
  • Potentially less integrated software experience compared to Huawei's ecosystem

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024)

  • Faster 66W wired charging
  • Strong integration within the Huawei ecosystem
  • Potentially optimized software experience for Huawei users

  • Less powerful Kirin 9000S chipset
  • 7nm process less efficient than 4nm

Display Comparison

While both tablets likely feature high-quality LCD panels (specific panel details are unavailable), the focus here is on performance. Display quality differences are assumed to be minimal without further data. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment. Color accuracy will depend on calibration, a detail not provided.

Camera Comparison

Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. Both tablets likely feature capable cameras for video conferencing and casual photography. However, given the focus on performance, camera quality is unlikely to be a primary differentiator. We can assume both will offer adequate image quality for typical tablet use cases.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Pad5’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) boasts a significantly more modern architecture than the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024)’s Kirin 9000S (7nm). The Dimensity 9300+ features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.4GHz, alongside three more Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85GHz, indicating a strong focus on sustained performance. The Kirin 9000S, with its Taishan architecture, while capable, is less efficient and likely to throttle more under prolonged load. The Dimensity 9300+'s 4nm node translates to better thermal efficiency, crucial for maintaining peak performance during extended gaming or video editing sessions. The CPU core count is similar, but the architectural advantages of the Dimensity 9300+ are substantial.

Battery Life

The Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024) takes the lead in charging speed with its 66W wired charging, compared to the vivo Pad5’s 44W. This translates to a faster 0-100% charge time for the Huawei device. However, the Dimensity 9300+’s superior efficiency may offset some of this advantage, potentially leading to comparable real-world battery life despite the charging speed difference. Both offer 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo Pad5 if you need a tablet for intensive tasks like video editing, gaming, or running demanding applications. The Dimensity 9300+ provides the headroom for these workloads. Buy the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024) if you are deeply invested in the Huawei ecosystem and prioritize fast charging alongside a refined user experience, accepting a performance trade-off.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Kirin 9000S in the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024) experience significant throttling during extended gaming sessions?
Given the 7nm process and the Dimensity 9300+'s superior thermal efficiency, the Kirin 9000S is more likely to experience throttling under sustained load. While Huawei's software optimizations may mitigate this, the vivo Pad5 should maintain higher sustained performance during demanding games.
❓ How much faster is the 66W charging on the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024) in real-world usage compared to the vivo Pad5's 44W?
Expect the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024) to charge approximately 30-40% faster than the vivo Pad5. A full charge could take around 45-60 minutes on the Huawei, while the vivo Pad5 might require 75-90 minutes. However, the Dimensity 9300+'s efficiency could minimize the impact on overall battery life.
❓ Does the Dimensity 9300+ in the vivo Pad5 support ray tracing for improved gaming visuals?
The Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ does support ray tracing, offering a more immersive gaming experience in compatible titles. This feature is not confirmed to be present in the Kirin 9000S, giving the vivo Pad5 an edge for gamers.