The Android tablet market is heating up, with both vivo and Xiaomi offering compelling options. The vivo Pad5 Pro, powered by the cutting-edge Mediatek Dimensity 9400, aims for top-tier performance. Meanwhile, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro leverages the proven Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the vivo Pad5 Pro with its Dimensity 9400 chipset is the winner. Its 3nm process and newer CPU architecture offer a performance edge. However, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro provides a strong value proposition with its efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and slightly faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | N/A |
| GPRS | No | N/A |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 21 | 2023, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2023, April 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 289.6 x 198.3 x 6.6 mm (11.40 x 7.81 x 0.26 in) | 254 x 165.2 x 6.5 mm (10.0 x 6.50 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 578 g or 635 g (1.27 lb) | 490 g (1.08 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 2064 x 3096 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~286 ppi density) | 1800 x 2880 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~309 ppi density) |
| Size | 13.0 inches, 503.2 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 550 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 HD | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | Unspecified | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, PD
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 1 hour |
| Type | 12050 mAh | Li-Po 8600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, White, Soft pink | Black, Blue, Gold |
| Models | - | 23046RP50C |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 330 EUR |
vivo Pad5 Pro
- Cutting-edge Dimensity 9400 chipset for superior performance
- 3nm process for improved efficiency and reduced throttling
- Potentially longer battery life due to chipset efficiency
- May command a higher price point
- Specific display details (LTPO, panel type) are unknown
Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers excellent performance
- Faster charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support
- Likely more affordable than the vivo Pad5 Pro
- 4nm process is less efficient than the Dimensity 9400’s 3nm
- CPU architecture is a generation behind
Display Comparison
Both tablets are expected to feature high-resolution displays, but specific details like panel type (LCD vs OLED) and refresh rate are missing. However, the core difference lies in the chipsets powering the visuals. The Dimensity 9400’s integrated GPU should offer a performance advantage in graphically intensive applications. The absence of LTPO information means we can't assess adaptive refresh rate capabilities, a key feature for battery life.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the tablet form factor, camera quality is often secondary to performance and display. Both manufacturers likely prioritize a capable main sensor for casual photography and video calls. The absence of information regarding OIS or lens apertures makes it impossible to assess low-light performance or image stabilization capabilities. We can assume both will offer acceptable, but not flagship-level, camera experiences.
Performance
The vivo Pad5 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, represents a significant leap in efficiency and performance compared to the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro’s 4nm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. The Dimensity 9400’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X925 prime core alongside three Cortex-X4 cores and four Cortex-A720 cores – is architecturally more advanced than the Snapdragon’s Cortex-X2, A710, and A510 setup. This translates to faster single-core and multi-core performance, particularly benefiting demanding applications. The 3nm node also implies better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro boasts a 67W charging solution, promising a full charge in just one hour, while the vivo Pad5 Pro offers 66W wired charging with PD support. While the difference is marginal, the Xiaomi’s inclusion of PD3.0 and QC4 adds compatibility with a wider range of chargers. Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but the more efficient 3nm Dimensity 9400 in the vivo Pad5 Pro could potentially offset a slightly smaller battery size, delivering comparable real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Pad5 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance for demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or high-end gaming, and are willing to pay a premium. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro if you prioritize a balance of performance, efficiency, and value, making it ideal for everyday productivity, media consumption, and casual gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9400 in the vivo Pad5 Pro experience significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The 3nm process of the Dimensity 9400 is designed to mitigate thermal throttling. While all high-performance chips generate heat, the improved efficiency should allow for sustained peak performance for longer periods compared to the 4nm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, especially in passively cooled tablet designs.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro support high refresh rate gaming, and what frame rates can be expected in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
While the refresh rate is unknown, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is capable of driving high refresh rate displays. Expect smooth gameplay in PUBG Mobile at high settings, potentially reaching 60fps or higher depending on the game's optimization and the tablet's display capabilities. However, sustained high frame rates may require adjusting graphics settings to manage thermals.
❓ Is the 66W charging on the vivo Pad5 Pro sufficient for all-day use, or will frequent top-ups be necessary?
66W charging is fast, but battery life depends heavily on usage patterns. The Dimensity 9400’s efficiency should contribute to good battery endurance. However, demanding tasks like video editing or gaming will consume power more quickly, potentially requiring a mid-day top-up for all-day use.
