The Android tablet market is heating up, with options ranging from budget-friendly media consumption devices to powerful productivity machines. The vivo Pad5 Pro and Realme Pad X represent distinct approaches: the former prioritizing raw performance with its latest-generation Dimensity chipset, and the latter focusing on a balanced feature set at a more accessible price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right tablet for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users demanding peak performance and future-proofing, the vivo Pad5 Pro is the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 9400 chipset. However, the Realme Pad X provides a compelling alternative for everyday tasks and media consumption, offering a solid experience at a lower cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 21 | 2022, May 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2022, June 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 289.6 x 198.3 x 6.6 mm (11.40 x 7.81 x 0.26 in) | 256.5 x 161.1 x 7.1 mm (10.10 x 6.34 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 578 g or 635 g (1.27 lb) | 499 g / 506 g (1.10 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic charging) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2064 x 3096 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~286 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~213 ppi density) |
| Size | 13.0 inches, 503.2 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.95 inches, 341.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 HD | Android, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | - |
| Single | 13 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | Unspecified | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, PD
5W reverse wired | 33W wired, PD
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 12050 mAh | 8340 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, White, Soft pink | Glowing Gray, Glacier Blue, Green |
| Models | - | RMP2107, RMP2108 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1664:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-22.5 LUFS (Excellent)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 395824 (v9)
GeekBench: 2026 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Pad5 Pro
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 9400 processor
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Potentially superior display technology (LTPO, higher resolution)
- Likely higher price point
- Display specifications currently unknown
Realme Pad X
- More affordable price
- Acceptable display brightness (496 nits)
- Solid performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 processor
- Slower 33W wired charging
Display Comparison
The Realme Pad X boasts a measured peak brightness of 496 nits and a 1655:1 contrast ratio, providing a visually acceptable experience for most users. However, the vivo Pad5 Pro’s display specifications are currently unavailable, leaving a gap in direct comparison. Given vivo’s track record, we anticipate a comparable or superior panel, potentially with features like LTPO for adaptive refresh rates, which would improve battery efficiency. The similar contrast ratios (1664:1 for Realme) suggest comparable image quality in terms of black levels, but the vivo Pad5 Pro may offer a wider color gamut and higher resolution.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for both tablets are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the positioning of these devices, it’s safe to assume the Realme Pad X’s camera is geared towards casual snapshots, while the vivo Pad5 Pro may offer slightly more advanced capabilities. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests neither tablet is a primary focus for photography enthusiasts.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The vivo Pad5 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, represents a significant leap forward compared to the Realme Pad X’s 6nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 9400’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X925 prime core alongside X4 and A720 cores – is architecturally superior to the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold and Silver cores. This translates to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly improved gaming performance. The 3nm node also implies better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Snapdragon 695 is adequate for everyday tasks, the Dimensity 9400 is in a different league.
Battery Life
Both tablets offer 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories. The vivo Pad5 Pro’s 66W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Realme Pad X’s 33W charging. This faster charging speed will dramatically reduce the time it takes to replenish the battery, offering greater convenience. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the vivo Pad5 Pro mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Pad5 Pro if you need a tablet capable of handling demanding tasks like video editing, graphic design, or high-end gaming. Its Dimensity 9400 processor and likely faster memory configuration will provide a smoother, more responsive experience. Buy the Realme Pad X if you prioritize portability, affordability, and a reliable tablet for everyday use – browsing, streaming, and light productivity. Its Snapdragon 695 is sufficient for these tasks, and the lower price makes it a more sensible choice for casual users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Realme Pad X struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a playable frame rate. It's not designed for consistently high-end gaming experiences.
❓ How much faster is the 66W charging on the vivo Pad5 Pro compared to the 33W charging on the Realme Pad X?
While exact times depend on battery capacity, 66W charging will likely reduce a full charge time by approximately 30-45 minutes compared to 33W. This is a substantial difference for users who need to quickly top up their tablet.
❓ Is the Dimensity 9400 likely to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions on the vivo Pad5 Pro?
The Dimensity 9400's 3nm process is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during gaming, it's less likely to experience significant throttling compared to older, less efficient chipsets. However, sustained heavy workloads will still generate heat.
