The Android tablet market is heating up, with the vivo Pad5 Pro and OnePlus Pad Pro representing compelling options for users seeking a larger screen experience. This comparison focuses on the core differences between these two devices, specifically their chipsets – the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 – and how those differences translate into real-world performance and usability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw processing power and potentially better sustained performance, the OnePlus Pad Pro with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is the stronger choice. However, the vivo Pad5 Pro’s Dimensity 9400 offers a competitive experience, and its 66W charging is a notable advantage for those who value quick top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | N/A |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 21 | 2024, June 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2024, June 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 289.6 x 198.3 x 6.6 mm (11.40 x 7.81 x 0.26 in) | 268.7 x 195.1 x 6.5 mm (10.58 x 7.68 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 578 g or 635 g (1.27 lb) | 584 g (1.29 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2064 x 3096 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~286 ppi density) | 2120 x 3000 pixels (~304 ppi density) |
| Size | 13.0 inches, 503.2 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.1 inches, 445.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 144Hz, 600 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 HD | Android 14, OxygenOS 14.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| NFC | No | NFC (data sharing only) |
| Positioning | Unspecified | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, PD
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, QC |
| Type | 12050 mAh | Li-Po 9510 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, White, Soft pink | Gray, Green |
| Models | - | OPD2404 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 370 EUR |
vivo Pad5 Pro
- Potentially more efficient 3nm Dimensity 9400 chipset
- 66W fast charging with PD
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessories
- Dimensity 9400 is a newer chipset with less established optimization
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
OnePlus Pad Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset with proven performance
- 4nm process for better thermal efficiency
- Support for both PD and QC fast charging standards
- Slightly lower peak CPU clock speed compared to vivo Pad5 Pro
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
While both tablets likely feature high-resolution displays (specs not provided), the core difference lies in the underlying processing power driving them. Display quality will be heavily influenced by panel technology and calibration, which are currently unknown. However, the chipset’s ability to smoothly render complex visuals will be a key factor in perceived display quality, giving the edge to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in graphically intensive scenarios.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent from the provided data. Given the tablet form factor, camera performance is typically less critical than on smartphones. However, assuming both devices feature similar sensor sizes and lens apertures, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s superior image signal processor (ISP) will likely result in better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions and with dynamic range. The ISP handles noise reduction, color accuracy, and overall image processing, giving the OnePlus Pad Pro a potential advantage.
Performance
The OnePlus Pad Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) boasts a more mature architecture and a proven track record for performance. Its octa-core configuration, while sharing similar Cortex-X4 cores with the vivo Pad5 Pro, features a slightly lower peak clock speed (3.3 GHz vs 3.63 GHz). However, the 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 generally translates to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The vivo Pad5 Pro’s Dimensity 9400 (3nm) aims to improve efficiency further with its smaller node size, but its real-world thermal performance remains to be seen. The Dimensity 9400’s Cortex-X925 core *could* offer a slight single-core performance advantage, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s optimized architecture and GPU are likely to provide a more consistent and powerful overall experience.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the charging capabilities are a clear differentiator. The OnePlus Pad Pro supports 67W wired charging with both PD and QC standards, offering broad compatibility. The vivo Pad5 Pro offers 66W wired charging with PD and 5W reverse wired charging. While the difference is minimal, the OnePlus Pad Pro’s support for Quick Charge could provide slightly faster charging speeds with compatible adapters. The 5W reverse wired charging on the vivo Pad5 Pro is a useful feature for topping up accessories, but its limited power output makes it less practical for charging larger devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Pad5 Pro if you prioritize fast charging speeds and a potentially more efficient chipset for everyday tasks. It’s ideal for users who frequently consume media and appreciate a quick return to full power. Buy the OnePlus Pad Pro if you demand the highest possible performance for demanding applications like gaming or video editing, and if you value Qualcomm’s established ecosystem and potentially wider software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9400 in the vivo Pad5 Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
While the 3nm process aims for efficiency, the Dimensity 9400 is a newer chipset. Its thermal performance under sustained load is currently unknown. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm process and established thermal management are likely to provide more consistent performance during long gaming sessions.
❓ Does the OnePlus Pad Pro support external displays via USB-C?
While not explicitly stated, tablets with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipsets generally support DisplayPort Alternate Mode (DP Alt Mode) over USB-C, allowing for connection to external displays. However, compatibility and resolution support may vary.
❓ How does the reverse charging feature on the vivo Pad5 Pro compare to wireless reverse charging?
The vivo Pad5 Pro’s 5W reverse *wired* charging is significantly slower than wireless reverse charging found on some other devices. It’s best suited for slowly topping up small accessories like earbuds or smartwatches, rather than fully charging a smartphone.
