The Android tablet market is heating up, with both vivo and Xiaomi offering compelling options in the premium mid-range. Both the vivo Pad3 and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, promising similar performance. However, key differences in charging speed and potentially battery optimization strategies create a compelling head-to-head. This comparison will dissect these tablets to determine which one delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and minimizing downtime, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 67W charging significantly reduces recharge times compared to the vivo Pad3’s 44W, offsetting the slightly shorter active use battery score. Both offer identical processing power, making charging speed the deciding factor.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | N/A |
| GPRS | No | N/A |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 28 | 2024, October 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 05 | Available. Released 2024, October 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 266.4 x 192 x 6.6 mm (10.49 x 7.56 x 0.26 in) | 251.2 x 173.4 x 6.2 mm (9.89 x 6.83 x 0.24 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 589.2 g (1.30 lb) | 500 g (1.10 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1968 x 2800 pixels (~283 ppi density) | 2136 x 3200 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~345 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.1 inches, 444.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.2 inches, 371.5 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | Unspecified | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, PD
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 40% in 20 min |
| Type | 10000 mAh | 8850 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Purple | Gray, Blue, Green |
| Models | - | 24091RPADG |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (body) |
vivo Pad3
- Potentially refined software experience (vivo's Funtouch OS)
- 44W charging with PD support
- Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 provides excellent performance
- Slower charging speed compared to Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
- Battery capacity and active use score unknown
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
- 67W fast charging (PD3.0, QC3+), 40% in 20 minutes
- 10:12h active use battery score
- Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 provides excellent performance
- Software experience may be less polished than vivo's Funtouch OS
- Potential for more aggressive power management to achieve battery score
Display Comparison
Both tablets share the same Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset, but display details are missing from the provided data. Assuming both target a similar premium experience, we can expect high-resolution LCD or OLED panels. The absence of refresh rate or resolution data makes a direct comparison impossible. However, Xiaomi often incorporates features like Dolby Vision and HDR10+ support, which may give it an edge if present. Bezels and color accuracy will be key differentiators once reviewed.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent from the provided data. Given the tablet form factor, camera quality is typically less of a priority than on smartphones. However, Xiaomi often includes larger sensors and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. Without specific details, it’s difficult to assess the camera capabilities of either device. We anticipate both will offer adequate cameras for video conferencing and casual photography.
Performance
The core of both the vivo Pad3 and Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro is the Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm). This octa-core CPU, with its 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520 cores, delivers identical processing capabilities. The 4nm fabrication process ensures excellent power efficiency, minimizing thermal throttling during sustained workloads. RAM configurations are unknown, but LPDDR5x is likely on both, further enhancing performance. Real-world performance will be nearly indistinguishable for most tasks.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro boasts a clear advantage in charging speed with its 67W wired charging (PD3.0, QC3+), capable of reaching 40% charge in just 20 minutes. In contrast, the vivo Pad3 is limited to 44W wired charging with PD, a significantly slower rate. While the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro has an active use battery score of 10:12h, the faster charging mitigates any potential disadvantage. The vivo Pad3’s battery capacity is unknown, but the slower charging speed will likely result in longer overall recharge times, even with a larger battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Pad3 if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience within vivo’s ecosystem and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who charge their tablets overnight or less frequently. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro if you value rapid charging and need to quickly top up your battery throughout the day, making it perfect for on-the-go professionals and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the 44W charging on the vivo Pad3 feel significantly slower in real-world use compared to the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro's 67W?
Yes, the difference between 44W and 67W charging is substantial. While 44W is still considered fast charging, 67W will noticeably reduce the time it takes to fully recharge the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro, especially for users who frequently deplete their battery. Expect a 30-60 minute difference in full recharge times.
❓ Given both tablets use the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, will I notice any performance difference when gaming or using demanding apps?
No, you are unlikely to notice a significant performance difference between the two tablets when gaming or running demanding applications. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is the same in both devices, and performance will largely depend on RAM configuration and thermal management, which are currently unknown. Any differences will likely be within the margin of error.
❓ Is the active use battery score of 10:12h on the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro representative of typical usage?
The 10:12h active use score is a standardized test result. Real-world battery life will vary depending on your usage patterns, screen brightness, and the apps you use. However, it provides a good indication that the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro offers competitive battery endurance.
