The Android tablet market is heating up, with both vivo and Xiaomi offering compelling high-end options. The vivo Pad3 Pro, powered by MediaTek’s flagship Dimensity 9300, directly challenges the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro and its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which tablet delivers the best experience for power users and everyday consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and potential for sustained performance, the vivo Pad3 Pro with its Dimensity 9300 chipset takes a slight edge. However, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro offers a well-rounded package with excellent battery life and fast charging, making it a strong contender for those valuing longevity and convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | N/A |
| GPRS | No | N/A |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 26 | 2024, October 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 03 | Available. Released 2024, October 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 289.6 x 198.3 x 6.6 mm (11.40 x 7.81 x 0.26 in) | 251.2 x 173.4 x 6.2 mm (9.89 x 6.83 x 0.24 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 679 g (1.50 lb) | 500 g (1.10 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2064 x 3096 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~286 ppi density) | 2136 x 3200 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~345 ppi density) |
| Size | 13.0 inches, 503.2 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.2 inches, 371.5 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 900 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | Unspecified | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, PD
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 40% in 20 min |
| Type | 11500 mAh | 8850 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Purple | Gray, Blue, Green |
| Models | - | 24091RPADG |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (body) |
vivo Pad3 Pro
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9300
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups
- Likely faster processing for demanding applications
- Potentially shorter battery life due to more powerful chipset
- Battery capacity is unknown
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
- Excellent battery life (10:12h active use)
- Fast 67W charging with 40% in 20 minutes
- Well-rounded performance from Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Slightly less powerful CPU compared to Dimensity 9300
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
Both tablets utilize 4nm chipsets, suggesting similar power efficiency considerations in display design. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type, brightness) are missing, the focus here is on performance. The absence of LTPO information means we can't assess adaptive refresh rate capabilities, a key feature for battery conservation. Bezels and color accuracy will be crucial differentiators, but require further testing.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, making a direct comparison impossible. However, given the tablet form factor, camera quality is typically less of a priority than on smartphones. We can assume both will feature capable main sensors for casual photography and video calls, but advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) or large sensor sizes would be significant differentiators. The absence of information prevents any meaningful analysis.
Performance
The core battle lies in the chipsets. The vivo Pad3 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300 features a unique core configuration – one Cortex-X4 at 3.25 GHz, three more at 2.85 GHz, and four efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz. This contrasts with the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, which has a single Cortex-X4 at 3.0 GHz, four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.8 GHz, and three Cortex-A520 cores at 2.0 GHz. The Dimensity 9300’s higher clock speeds and more X4 cores suggest superior single-core and multi-core performance, particularly in CPU-bound tasks. However, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s GPU performance needs to be considered, and its thermal management could prove more efficient, preventing throttling under sustained load. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed isn't specified, impacting overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro boasts a clear advantage in battery life, achieving 10:12 hours of active use. While the vivo Pad3 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the more powerful Dimensity 9300 likely consumes more energy. Both support 67W wired charging with PD, but the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro highlights a 40% charge in 20 minutes, a tangible benefit for users needing a quick boost. The vivo Pad3 Pro also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Pad3 Pro if you need uncompromising CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or heavy multitasking. Its Dimensity 9300 offers a clear advantage in these scenarios. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life and quick top-ups; its 10:12 active use score and 67W charging are ideal for users constantly on the go and less concerned with absolute peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9300 in the vivo Pad3 Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9300 is a powerful chip, sustained performance depends heavily on thermal management. Without knowing the cooling solution implemented in the vivo Pad3 Pro, it's difficult to say definitively. However, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro is known for its relatively efficient thermal profile, potentially offering more consistent performance over long periods.
❓ How does the 67W charging on both tablets compare in real-world usage?
Both tablets support 67W charging, but the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro specifically claims a 40% charge in 20 minutes. This suggests a more optimized charging curve or potentially a slightly faster charging implementation. While both will offer quick top-ups, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro appears to have a slight edge in charging speed.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Dimensity 9300 and Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 noticeable for everyday tasks?
For typical tasks like browsing, streaming, and social media, the difference in CPU performance will likely be minimal. Both chipsets are more than capable of handling these workloads smoothly. The Dimensity 9300’s advantage will be most apparent in demanding applications like video editing, 3D rendering, or running multiple resource-intensive apps simultaneously.
