vivo Pad vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad: The Ultimate Tablet Comparison

The tablet market is heating up, and two contenders vying for your attention are the vivo Pad and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad. Both offer compelling features at competitive prices, but which one is the right choice for you? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The vivo Pad takes the performance crown thanks to its Snapdragon 870 chipset. However, the Redmi Pad offers a more budget-friendly option with a decent display and acceptable performance for everyday tasks. Ultimately, the vivo Pad is for power users, while the Redmi Pad is ideal for casual users.

PHONES
Phone Names	vivo Pad	Xiaomi Redmi Pad

Network
2G bands	N/A	N/A
3G bands	N/A	N/A
4G bands	N/A	N/A
EDGE	No	N/A
GPRS	No	N/A
Technology	No cellular connectivity	No cellular connectivity

Launch
Announced	2022, April 11	2022, October 04
Status	Available. Released 2022, April 15	Available. Released 2022, October 05

Body
Build	Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame	Glass front, aluminum frame
Dimensions	253.2 x 164.7 x 6.6 mm (9.97 x 6.48 x 0.26 in)	250.5 x 158.1 x 7.1 mm (9.86 x 6.22 x 0.28 in)
SIM	No	No
Weight	489 g (1.08 lb)	465 g (1.03 lb)
	Stylus support	-

Display
Resolution	1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density)	1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density)
Size	11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio)	10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10	IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)	Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)	Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
GPU	Adreno 650	Mali-G57 MC2
OS	Android 12, OriginOS HD	Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14

Memory
Card slot	No	microSDXC
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM	64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2

Main Camera
Dual	13 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm	-
Features	LED flash, panorama	-
Single	8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm	8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Selfie camera
Single	8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm	8 MP, f/2.3, 105° (ultrawide)
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)	Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.2, A2DP, LE	5.2, A2DP, LE
NFC	Yes	No
Positioning	GPS	No
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connector	USB Type-C, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Accelerometer

Battery
Charging	44W wired, PD 5W reverse wired	18W wired
Type	8040 mAh	Li-Po 8000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, Blue	Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, Mint Green
Models	-	22081283G
Price	About 360 EUR	About 250 EUR
SAR EU	-	0.36 W/kg (body)

Tests
Display	-	Contrast ratio: 1529:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-23.9 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 319077 (v9) GeekBench: 1852 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo Pad

Superior Performance (Snapdragon 870)
Faster Charging (44W)
Likely Larger Display
Better Multitasking

Potentially Shorter Battery Life
Higher Price

Xiaomi Redmi Pad

More Affordable
Decent Display Brightness
Good for Casual Use
Likely Better Battery Life (under light use)

Lower Performance (Helio G99)
Slower Charging (18W)
May Struggle with Demanding Apps

Display Comparison

Both tablets feature a 1529:1 contrast ratio, indicating good black levels. However, the Redmi Pad's measured 402 nits brightness gives it a slight edge in visibility under bright conditions. The vivo Pad's display is likely to be slightly larger, offering more screen real estate, but specific resolution details are needed for a complete comparison. Color accuracy and overall display quality are likely comparable, leaning towards the Redmi Pad due to the brightness.

Camera Comparison

Camera specifications are missing for both devices. Assuming typical tablet camera performance, neither is likely to be a standout. Expect decent quality for video calls and occasional snapshots, but not for serious photography. The vivo Pad *might* have a slight edge due to the more powerful processor potentially aiding image processing.

Performance

This is where the vivo Pad truly shines. The Snapdragon 870 is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Helio G99. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a much better gaming experience on the vivo Pad. The Redmi Pad will handle basic tasks adequately, but it will struggle with more demanding applications.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is not specified. However, the vivo Pad's more powerful chipset will likely consume more power, potentially leading to shorter battery life under heavy use. The Redmi Pad, with its less demanding processor, could offer better battery endurance for casual usage. The 44W charging on the vivo Pad is a significant advantage over the Redmi Pad's 18W charging.

Buying Guide

The vivo Pad is perfect for users who prioritize performance, gaming, and multitasking. It's a great choice for students, professionals, and anyone who wants a tablet that can handle demanding applications. The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a fantastic option for those on a budget who need a reliable tablet for browsing, streaming, and light productivity. It's ideal for families and casual users.