The Android landscape offers diverse choices, and today we're pitting a tablet against a smartphone: the vivo Pad and the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. This isn't a typical comparison, but it highlights the trade-offs between portability and screen real estate. Let's dive into a detailed breakdown to see which device comes out on top.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo Pad offers a larger, more immersive display and a powerful Snapdragon 870, making it ideal for media consumption and productivity. The Poco X3 Pro, however, provides superior portability and a longer-lasting battery. Ultimately, the winner depends on your priorities: tablet functionality or smartphone convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 11 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 15 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 253.2 x 164.7 x 6.6 mm (9.97 x 6.48 x 0.26 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 489 g (1.08 lb) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | Stylus support | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS HD | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, PD
5W reverse wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 8040 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | - | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 360 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Pad
- Larger, immersive display
- Powerful Snapdragon 870
- Faster charging (44W)
- Better for media consumption and productivity
- Battery life likely shorter than Poco X3 Pro
- Less portable
- Camera details unknown, potentially less versatile
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (112h endurance rating)
- Compact and pocketable
- Good value for money
- Potentially more versatile camera system
- Smaller display
- Slightly less powerful processor than vivo Pad
- 33W charging is slower
Display Comparison
The vivo Pad boasts a significantly larger display, offering a more immersive viewing experience for videos, games, and browsing. While both devices have a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, the sheer size of the Pad's screen makes a noticeable difference. The Poco X3 Pro's display is perfectly adequate for a smartphone, but it can't compete with the Pad's expansive visuals.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse in the provided specs. Assuming typical configurations for these devices, the Poco X3 Pro likely has a more versatile camera system with multiple lenses. The vivo Pad, being a tablet, might prioritize a simpler, more functional camera setup. Actual camera quality would require a more detailed review.
Performance
The vivo Pad's Snapdragon 870 generally outperforms the Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860. While both are capable chips, the 870 offers a slight edge in CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking and more demanding games running better on the Pad. However, the Poco X3 Pro still provides a very responsive experience for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 Pro shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 112h suggests exceptional battery life, far surpassing what we'd expect from a tablet. The vivo Pad's 44W charging is respectable, but the Poco X3 Pro's longevity is a major advantage for users who prioritize all-day power.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo Pad? Users seeking a larger screen for entertainment, gaming, or productivity tasks. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro? Those prioritizing a compact, pocketable device with excellent battery life and a focus on value.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo Pad good for gaming?
Yes, the Snapdragon 870 and larger display make the vivo Pad a decent gaming device, though it's not a dedicated gaming tablet. More demanding titles may require adjusted graphics settings.
❓ Can the Poco X3 Pro last a full day on a single charge?
Absolutely. The Poco X3 Pro's exceptional battery life should easily get you through a full day of moderate to heavy use.
