The Android tablet market is heating up, with both vivo and Xiaomi offering compelling options. The vivo Pad, leveraging the Snapdragon 870, aims for a balance of performance and value. However, the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 arrives with the significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, promising a substantial upgrade in processing capabilities. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers a dramatically faster experience, and its 120W charging is a game-changer. While the vivo Pad offers a more affordable entry point, the performance gap is too significant to ignore for power users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | N/A |
| GPRS | No | N/A |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 11 | 2024, February 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 15 | Available. Released 2024, February 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 253.2 x 164.7 x 6.6 mm (9.97 x 6.48 x 0.26 in) | 278.7 x 191.6 x 6.3 mm (10.97 x 7.54 x 0.25 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 489 g (1.08 lb) | 590 g (1.30 lb) |
| | Stylus support | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 2032 x 3048 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.4 inches, 457.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS HD | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (file transfer only) |
| Positioning | GPS | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, PD
5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 8040 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Blue, Green |
| Models | - | 24018RPACG |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 700 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (body) |
vivo Pad
- More affordable price point
- Capable Snapdragon 870 processor for everyday tasks
- 44W fast charging with PD support
- Significantly slower performance compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Likely lower display brightness and contrast
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Bright and high-contrast 12.4-inch display
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Higher price tag
- Larger size may not be ideal for all users
- Battery life, while good, isn't exceptional
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 848 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Pad. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in outdoor conditions. While both likely utilize IPS LCD technology (given the lack of OLED specification), the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro’s 1378:1 contrast ratio suggests a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. Bezels are not specified for either device, but the larger screen size of the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro may result in slightly wider borders. Color accuracy is also unknown for both, but Xiaomi often calibrates its displays for good color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. Given the tablet form factor, camera quality is rarely a primary concern. However, the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro is likely to have a more advanced camera system due to its higher-end positioning. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison, but Xiaomi generally prioritizes camera performance even in its tablets. The vivo Pad’s camera is likely adequate for basic video calls and casual snapshots.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a generational leap over the vivo Pad’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 8 Gen 2 features a Cortex-X3 prime core, alongside Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores, and Cortex-A510 efficiency cores, offering significantly improved CPU and GPU performance. The Snapdragon 870, while still capable, uses older Kryo 585 cores. The 4nm process node of the 8 Gen 2 also provides superior thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both tablets likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, the 8 Gen 2’s memory controller is faster, further enhancing performance. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience on the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 shines in the charging department with its 120W wired charging, capable of reaching 45% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 35 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the vivo Pad’s 44W charging. While the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro’s active use battery score is 11:14h, the vivo Pad’s battery capacity is unknown. The faster charging of the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro mitigates any potential disadvantage in battery capacity, offering greater convenience and reducing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Pad if you prioritize affordability and a capable, though not leading-edge, tablet experience for everyday tasks like browsing, video streaming, and light productivity. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 if you demand top-tier performance for demanding applications, gaming, or professional workflows, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 870 in the vivo Pad struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 870 is capable, it will likely require lower graphics settings and may experience some frame drops in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 will handle these games with ease at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro compared to the vivo Pad’s 44W charging in real-world use?
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro can gain a substantial charge in a short amount of time – 45% in 10 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes. The vivo Pad’s 44W charging will take considerably longer to reach a full charge, making the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro much more convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the larger 12.4-inch display of the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro unwieldy for reading or taking notes?
The larger display can be beneficial for multitasking and media consumption, but it may be less comfortable for extended reading or note-taking sessions for some users. Consider your typical usage scenarios and hand size when evaluating this factor.
