vivo Pad vs Xiaomi Pad 5: The Ultimate Tablet Comparison

The Android tablet market is heating up, and the vivo Pad and Xiaomi Pad 5 are two strong contenders. Both offer impressive features and performance, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The vivo Pad edges out the Xiaomi Pad 5 thanks to its Snapdragon 870 chipset, offering a noticeable performance boost. However, the Xiaomi Pad 5 boasts a slightly brighter display and a competitive price, making it a compelling alternative for budget-conscious buyers.

PHONES
Phone Names	vivo Pad	Xiaomi Pad 5

Network
2G bands	N/A	N/A
3G bands	N/A	N/A
4G bands	N/A	-
EDGE	No	N/A
GPRS	No	N/A
Technology	No cellular connectivity	No cellular connectivity

Launch
Announced	2022, April 11	2021, August 10
Status	Available. Released 2022, April 15	Available. Released 2021, August 10

Body
Build	Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame	Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back
Dimensions	253.2 x 164.7 x 6.6 mm (9.97 x 6.48 x 0.26 in)	254.7 x 166.3 x 6.9 mm (10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 in)
SIM	No	No
Weight	489 g (1.08 lb)	511 g (1.13 lb)
	Stylus support	Stylus support (magnetic)

Display
Resolution	1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density)	1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density)
Size	11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio)	11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10	IPS LCD, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)	Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)	Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm)
GPU	Adreno 650	Adreno 640
OS	Android 12, OriginOS HD	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM	128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1

Main Camera
Dual	13 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm	-
Features	LED flash, panorama	Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single	8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm	13 MP, f/2.0
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps

Selfie camera
Single	8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm	8 MP, f/2.0
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)	Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.2, A2DP, LE	5.0, A2DP, LE
NFC	Yes	No
Positioning	GPS	No
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connector	USB Type-C
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Battery
Charging	44W wired, PD 5W reverse wired	33W wired, PD3.0
Type	8040 mAh	Li-Po 8720 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, Blue	Cosmic Gray, Pearl White, Green
Models	-	21051182G, 21051182C
Price	About 360 EUR	About 350 EUR

Tests
Display	-	Contrast ratio: 1271:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-24.4 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 473819 (v8), 555079 (v9) GeekBench: 2583 (v5.1) GFXBench: 24fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo Pad

Superior Performance (Snapdragon 870)
Slightly Better Camera
5W Reverse Charging

Potentially Higher Price
Slightly Smaller Battery

Xiaomi Pad 5

Brighter Display (478 nits)
Competitive Price
Slightly Larger Battery

Slightly Less Powerful Chipset
Camera slightly behind vivo Pad

Display Comparison

Both tablets feature stunning 1271:1 contrast ratio displays. The Xiaomi Pad 5 measures a peak brightness of 478 nits, slightly exceeding the vivo Pad's reported brightness. While both offer excellent visuals, the Xiaomi Pad 5's slightly higher brightness could be advantageous in brighter environments. Both have a resolution of 2560 x 1600.

Camera Comparison

Camera quality is often not a primary concern for tablets, but the vivo Pad generally has a better camera setup. The vivo Pad features a 13MP rear camera, while the Xiaomi Pad 5 has a 13MP rear camera. Front-facing cameras are both 8MP. Image processing and overall quality are slightly better on the vivo Pad.

Performance

The vivo Pad holds a clear advantage here. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset is more powerful than the Xiaomi Pad 5's Snapdragon 860. This translates to smoother performance in demanding games, faster app loading times, and better multitasking capabilities. The 870's higher clock speeds contribute to this performance difference.

Battery Life

The Xiaomi Pad 5 has a 8720 mAh battery, while the vivo Pad has an 8040 mAh battery. Both offer all-day battery life for moderate usage. The Xiaomi Pad 5's slightly larger battery capacity *could* translate to marginally longer usage, but real-world performance is likely to be similar.

Buying Guide

The vivo Pad is ideal for users who prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps. The Xiaomi Pad 5 is a great choice for those seeking a well-rounded tablet experience with a vibrant display and excellent value for money, especially for media consumption and casual use.