vivo NEX 3S 5G vs Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X2 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its significantly faster 65W charging – achieving a full charge in just 38 minutes – and measured 871 nits peak brightness provide tangible benefits over the NEX 3S 5G’s 44W charging and unspecified display performance. While both offer similar processing power, the Find X2 Pro’s charging and display advantages justify its position.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo NEX 3S 5G | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 10. Released 2020, March 14 | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 76.1 x 9.4 mm (6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 219.5 g (7.76 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2256 pixels (~363 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.89 inches, 119.3 cm2 (~93.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, 52mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | V1950A | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | About 630 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo NEX 3S 5G
- Potentially lower price point
- Snapdragon 865 5G performance
- 5G connectivity
- Slower 44W charging
- Unspecified display brightness
- Limited camera details
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- 65W SuperVOOC 2.0 charging (38 min 0-100%)
- 871 nits peak display brightness
- Infinite contrast ratio
- Higher price
- Potential for software bloat (Oppo UI)
- May require proprietary charger for fastest speeds
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a demonstrably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 871 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the NEX 3S 5G, whose peak brightness remains unspecified. While both likely utilize high-refresh-rate OLED panels (a common feature of 2020 flagships), the Find X2 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a more refined visual experience. The lack of detailed display specs for the NEX 3S 5G makes a precise comparison difficult, but the Find X2 Pro clearly holds an advantage in raw brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or image processing algorithms, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the flagship positioning of both devices suggests the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) and advanced computational photography features. The absence of details regarding the NEX 3S 5G’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities relative to the Find X2 Pro, but the Find X2 Pro’s reputation for image quality gives it a slight edge.
Performance
Both the vivo NEX 3S 5G and Oppo Find X2 Pro are powered by the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), featuring an identical CPU configuration: an octa-core setup with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually indistinguishable between the two devices. The real-world performance difference will likely hinge on thermal management and sustained performance, areas where Oppo historically excels with its cooling solutions. Both devices utilize LPDDR5 RAM, ensuring fast application loading and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X2 Pro’s 65W SuperVOOC 2.0 charging is a standout feature, capable of charging the device from 0 to 100% in a remarkable 38 minutes. The vivo NEX 3S 5G, with its 44W wired charging, is significantly slower. Both phones share an endurance rating of 88 hours, suggesting similar battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (which is not specified for either device). The faster charging speed of the Find X2 Pro is a significant convenience factor, especially for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo NEX 3S 5G if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with a slower charging experience. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, a brighter and more vibrant display, and are willing to pay a premium for these enhancements. Both phones are excellent, but cater to slightly different user priorities.