vivo NEX 3 vs Realme X2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and all-day battery life, the Realme X2 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 50W SuperVOOC charging, achieving 100% in just 35 minutes, significantly outperforms the NEX 3’s 44W charging. While both offer comparable performance, the X2 Pro’s charging speed and endurance rating provide a tangible advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo NEX 3 | Realme X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - EMEA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2019, October 15. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 76.1 x 9.4 mm (6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 161 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217.3 g (7.65 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2256 pixels (~363 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.89 inches, 119.3 cm2 (~93.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | 64GB UFS 2.1, 128/256GB UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, (telephoto), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with Dolby Atmos stereo speakers (2 dedicated amplifiers) |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio (incl. speakers) | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 50W wired, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Lunar White, Neptune Blue, Red Master Edition, Gray Master Edition |
| Models | V1923A, V1923T, 1908_19, 1912 | RMX1931 |
| Price | About 640 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -91.3dB / Crosstalk -92.5dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 82dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 91dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 396827 (v7), 467653 (v8) GeekBench: 10373 (v4.4) GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo NEX 3
- Unique waterfall display design
- Snapdragon 855+ performance
- Fast 44W charging
- Waterfall display prone to accidental touches
- Slower charging compared to X2 Pro
- Limited camera details
Realme X2 Pro
- 50W SuperVOOC charging (35 min to 100%)
- Excellent 94h endurance rating
- Aggressive price point
- Less visually striking display design
- Limited camera details
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Realme)
Display Comparison
Both devices boast displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, the NEX 3’s defining feature is its waterfall display, curving dramatically over the sides, minimizing bezels. While visually striking, this design can introduce accidental touches. The X2 Pro, while lacking the extreme curvature, likely offers a more practical viewing experience. Detailed specifications like peak brightness and color accuracy are missing, but given the era, both likely employed AMOLED panels with vibrant colors. The NEX 3's waterfall design is a key differentiator, but its usability is a potential concern.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The context data only mentions 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Given the market positioning, the X2 Pro likely focused on delivering a versatile camera experience with a strong emphasis on image quality. The NEX 3 may have prioritized innovative features or a unique aesthetic. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or OIS implementation, a direct comparison is challenging. The absence of details regarding the 2MP macro cameras suggests they were likely included for marketing purposes rather than significant photographic utility.
Performance
Both the vivo NEX 3 and Realme X2 Pro are equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration: 1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485, and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical in most tasks. The GPU performance will also be similar. Thermal management, however, could differ based on chassis design and cooling solutions. Without specific thermal testing data, it’s difficult to definitively say which phone sustains peak performance for longer periods. RAM configurations are not specified, but both likely offered ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Battery Life
The Realme X2 Pro boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 50W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 35 minutes. The vivo NEX 3’s 44W charging is respectable, but noticeably slower. Both phones share an endurance rating of 94 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage scenarios. However, the X2 Pro’s faster charging mitigates any potential concerns about battery drain, allowing for quicker top-ups throughout the day. The difference in charging speed is a key factor for users who prioritize convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo NEX 3 if you prioritize a truly immersive, almost entirely bezel-less display experience and are willing to trade some charging speed for that visual impact. Buy the Realme X2 Pro if you value fast charging, solid battery life, and a comprehensive feature set without the premium price tag. The X2 Pro is the more practical choice for power users and those constantly on the go.