vivo NEX 3 vs Oppo Reno Ace: Which Snapdragon 855+ Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno Ace emerges as the more practical choice. Its 65W SuperVOOC charging, capable of a full charge in just 30 minutes, significantly outweighs the NEX 3’s 44W charging. While the NEX 3 boasts a more visually striking waterfall display, the Reno Ace’s brighter panel and comparable battery life make it the better daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo NEX 3 | Oppo Reno Ace |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2019, October. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 76.1 x 9.4 mm (6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 161 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217.3 g (7.65 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2256 pixels (~363 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.89 inches, 119.3 cm2 (~93.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10 | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, ColorOS 7.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm, AF 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, (telephoto), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; (gyro-EIS); video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Electric purple, Interstellar blue, Gundam Edition |
| Models | V1923A, V1923T, 1908_19, 1912 | PCLM10 |
| Price | About 640 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -92.0dB / Crosstalk -93.3dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 79dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 87dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 354367 (v7), 434063 (v8) GeekBench: 11008 (v4.4), 2627 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo NEX 3
- Immersive waterfall display design
- Powerful Snapdragon 855+ processor
- Visually striking aesthetics
- Slower 44W charging
- Potentially lower display brightness
- Waterfall display prone to accidental touches
Oppo Reno Ace
- Blazing-fast 65W SuperVOOC charging
- Brighter 717 nit display
- Excellent battery endurance (99h)
- Less visually striking display design
- Similar processor to NEX 3
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The vivo NEX 3’s defining feature is its ‘waterfall’ display, curving dramatically over the sides for an almost bezel-less look. However, this design comes with trade-offs. The Oppo Reno Ace features a more conventional, albeit still high-quality, AMOLED display with a measured peak brightness of 717 nits. This is a significant advantage over the NEX 3, which lacks a published brightness figure, making the Reno Ace more usable in direct sunlight. While the NEX 3’s curvature is visually appealing, it can lead to accidental touches and a less practical viewing experience. Both displays offer an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED technology, ensuring deep blacks and vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer capable camera systems, but detailed specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are lacking. Given Oppo’s strong camera reputation, the Reno Ace likely benefits from more refined image processing algorithms. Sensor size and lens apertures are critical factors, but unavailable in the provided data. It’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a primary wide-angle lens, an ultrawide, and potentially a telephoto lens. The absence of details regarding Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
Both the vivo NEX 3 and Oppo Reno Ace are powered by the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485). This means raw processing power is virtually identical. Performance will largely depend on RAM management and thermal throttling, areas where Oppo historically excels with its cooling solutions. While neither phone specifies RAM speed (likely LPDDR4X), the Reno Ace’s optimized software and potentially more efficient thermal design could provide a slight edge in sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming. The identical chipsets mean both phones can handle any Android application or game with ease.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno Ace boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 65W SuperVOOC wired charging, achieving a 100% charge in just 30 minutes. The vivo NEX 3’s 44W charging is respectable, but considerably slower. Both phones share an endurance rating of 99h, suggesting comparable battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified). The Reno Ace’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference, allowing users to quickly replenish their battery and minimize downtime. This makes the Reno Ace the clear winner for users who prioritize convenience and minimal charging interruptions.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo NEX 3 if you prioritize a truly immersive, edge-to-edge display experience and are willing to trade some charging speed and potentially battery life for it. This phone is for the visual enthusiast. Buy the Oppo Reno Ace if you value fast charging, reliable battery performance, and a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions. This is the phone for power users who need to top up quickly and stay connected all day.