vivo NEX 3 vs OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren: Which Snapdragon 855+ Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly more refined software experience, the vivo NEX 3 emerges as the winner. Its 44W charging significantly reduces downtime, and while both phones offer similar performance, the NEX 3’s faster charging is a tangible benefit in daily use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo NEX 3 | OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 71 SA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2019, October 23. Released 2019, November 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 76.1 x 9.4 mm (6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217.3 g (7.65 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2256 pixels (~363 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~516 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.89 inches, 119.3 cm2 (~93.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10 | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.1 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, (telephoto), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4085 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Papaya Orange |
| Models | V1923A, V1923T, 1908_19, 1912 | HD1925 |
| Price | About 640 EUR | About 800 EUR |
vivo NEX 3
- Significantly faster 44W charging
- Visually striking waterfall display
- Potentially more vibrant image processing
- Waterfall display prone to accidental touches
- Software experience may not appeal to all users
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren
- Refined OxygenOS software experience
- McLaren branding and aesthetic
- Potentially better thermal management
- Slower 30W charging
- Less visually striking display design
Display Comparison
Both devices feature AMOLED displays, but their implementations differ. While specific refresh rates aren't provided, both likely support 90Hz. The vivo NEX 3 boasts a 'waterfall' display, curving dramatically over the sides, minimizing bezels. This design, while visually striking, can introduce accidental touches. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren features a less aggressive curve, prioritizing usability. The lack of specified peak brightness or color accuracy data makes a direct comparison difficult, but the NEX 3’s waterfall design is the more visually ambitious, albeit potentially less practical, choice.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are unavailable, but both phones likely feature multi-camera systems. The focus should be on image processing. vivo typically emphasizes vibrant, saturated colors, while OnePlus leans towards a more natural look. Without sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a significant omission; its presence would be a major advantage for video recording and low-light photography.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ (7nm), featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with a 2.96 GHz Kryo 485 prime core. The only CPU difference is the clock speed of the smaller cores – 1.8 GHz on the NEX 3 versus 1.78 GHz on the 7T Pro 5G McLaren. This minor difference is unlikely to be noticeable in real-world usage. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, and thermal management will be crucial to sustained performance. Given the similar chipsets, performance will be largely dictated by software optimization and cooling solutions, areas where OnePlus historically excels.
Battery Life
The vivo NEX 3’s 44W wired charging is a clear advantage over the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s 30W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, faster charging translates to significantly less time tethered to a wall outlet. A 44W charger can realistically deliver a full charge in under an hour, while 30W will take considerably longer. This difference is particularly impactful for users who frequently deplete their battery throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo NEX 3 if you need the fastest possible charging speeds and appreciate a truly bezel-less waterfall display. It’s ideal for power users who demand minimal downtime. Buy the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren if you prefer OnePlus’s OxygenOS software, which is known for its clean interface and customization options, and value the McLaren branding and associated aesthetic.