vivo iQOO Z9x vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset and 120W charging offer a noticeable advantage. However, the iQOO Z9x remains a strong contender for those seeking a balanced experience at a potentially lower cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z9x | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 29 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.05 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Tornado Green (Northern Green), Storm Grey (Mystic Black), White | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | V2353A, I2219 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | ₹ 13,499 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Z9x
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Significantly slower charging speed (44W)
- Likely dimmer display
- Less powerful CPU and GPU
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (0-100% in 19 mins)
- Brighter and potentially higher-quality display (1283 nits)
- More powerful Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset
- Likely higher price tag
- May not include reverse wireless charging
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1283 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the iQOO Z9x’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be considerably dimmer. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s higher brightness also suggests a more advanced panel technology, potentially with better color accuracy and contrast. The lack of information on the iQOO Z9x’s panel type (AMOLED vs. LCD) and refresh rate makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ clearly holds an advantage in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the iQOO Z9x, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s image processing will likely prioritize detail and dynamic range, while the iQOO Z9x may lean towards a more natural look. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the iQOO Z9x suggests the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ will offer superior low-light performance and video stabilization.
Performance
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is equipped with the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, featuring a more modern CPU architecture (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) compared to the iQOO Z9x’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). The Cortex-A715 cores in the Dimensity chip offer a substantial performance uplift over the Cortex-A78 cores in the Snapdragon. Both chips are fabricated on a 4nm process, suggesting similar efficiency, but the architectural advantages of the Dimensity 7200 Ultra will result in faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is likely to handle graphically intensive games with higher frame rates and fewer stutters.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of fully charging the device in just 19 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the iQOO Z9x’s 44W charging, which will take considerably longer. While the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 10:38h indicates excellent battery life. The iQOO Z9x’s battery capacity is also unknown, but the slower charging speed suggests it may need to be topped up more frequently. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s support for PD3.0 adds further versatility to its charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z9x if you need a reliable daily driver with a decent processor for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and if maximizing value for your money is paramount. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prioritize rapid charging, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more powerful chipset for demanding applications and gaming, and are willing to spend a bit more.