The iQOO Z9 and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both leverage MediaTek's Dimensity series, but target slightly different priorities – the iQOO Z9 emphasizing value and the Poco X6 Pro pushing performance boundaries. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset, coupled with a brighter display and faster charging, justifies the potential price premium. However, the iQOO Z9 remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing efficiency.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 12 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 13 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Dragontrail Star 2 Plus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR, 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 30 min | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Brushed Green, Graphene Blue | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | I2302, I2218 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Z9
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Efficient Dimensity 7200 chipset for everyday tasks
- 44W fast charging provides a reasonable top-up speed
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Poco X6 Pro
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Limited camera details suggest a less advanced system
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster 67W charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support
- Potentially higher price tag
- More powerful chipset may consume more battery
- No information on display technology (LTPO)
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the iQOO Z9. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display’s impact on overall power consumption should be considered. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to manage battery drain, but the X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Context data for both devices is limited regarding camera specifics. However, given the Poco X6 Pro’s positioning, it’s likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system. While both will likely include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, the X6 Pro may benefit from a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The iQOO Z9 will likely focus on providing adequate image quality for social media sharing, while the X6 Pro aims for a more versatile and detailed photographic experience. The absence of details regarding OIS on either device suggests image stabilization may be limited.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the iQOO Z9 features the Mediatek Dimensity 7200, while the Poco X6 Pro utilizes the Dimensity 8300 Ultra. The 8300 Ultra’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – is a significant upgrade over the Z9’s 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510. This translates to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. The X6 Pro’s more powerful GPU will also deliver higher frame rates in graphically intensive games. Both are built on a 4nm process, but the architectural improvements in the 8300 Ultra provide a substantial performance leap.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance, achieving 11:46h of active use. While the iQOO Z9’s battery capacity is not specified, the X6 Pro’s endurance is impressive. Furthermore, the X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support allows for a full charge in 45 minutes, significantly faster than the iQOO Z9’s 44W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 50%. This faster charging is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z9 if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance and prioritize a lower price point. It's ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and occasionally game. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, especially for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. Its superior chipset and faster charging make it the better choice for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is a powerful chip, its 4nm process and efficient architecture help mitigate thermal throttling. However, sustained gaming at maximum settings will inevitably generate heat. The Poco X6 Pro likely incorporates thermal management solutions like vapor chamber cooling to maintain stable performance, but users should expect some temperature increase during extended gameplay.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the iQOO Z9 slow compared to the 67W on the Poco X6 Pro?
Yes, the 67W charging on the Poco X6 Pro is considerably faster. While 44W is still considered fast charging, it takes 30 minutes to reach 50% charge, whereas the X6 Pro achieves 100% in 45 minutes. For users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery, the X6 Pro’s charging speed is a significant advantage.
❓ How does the CPU core configuration of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra benefit real-world performance compared to the Dimensity 7200?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s CPU configuration, with more high-performance Cortex-A715 cores (1x3.35 GHz + 3x3.20 GHz) compared to the iQOO Z9’s (2x2.8 GHz), directly translates to faster processing speeds. This is particularly noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, and multitasking, resulting in a smoother and more responsive user experience.
