The iQOO Z9 and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The iQOO Z9 focuses on delivering rapid charging and solid performance with the Dimensity 7200, while the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion aims for a more balanced experience with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and a brighter display. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw charging speed and consistent performance under load, the iQOO Z9 emerges as the winner. Its 44W charging, while not as fast as the Motorola's 68W, is still respectable, and the Dimensity 7200 offers a stable experience. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion’s brighter display and potentially longer battery life make it a strong contender for media consumers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 12 | 2024, April 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 13 | Available. Released 2024, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 174.9 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Dragontrail Star 2 Plus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR, 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - LATAM |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) - LATAM |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 30 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Brushed Green, Graphene Blue | Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | I2302, I2218 | XT2429-1 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 208.99 / $ 245.00 / ₹ 18,667 |
| SAR | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo iQOO Z9
- Faster sustained performance with Dimensity 7200
- Rapid 44W charging
- Potentially better single-core performance
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Battery life details are unknown
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
- Significantly brighter 1322 nit display
- Impressive 12:40h active use battery life
- Faster 68W charging
- Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 variant (LATAM) offers significantly lower performance
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1322 nits, making it ideal for outdoor use under direct sunlight. While the iQOO Z9’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower in peak brightness. The Edge 50 Fusion’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator for users who frequently consume content outdoors. The panel technology and refresh rate are not specified for either device, but the brightness difference is a clear win for Motorola.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited. Without information on sensor sizes, apertures, or OIS, a direct comparison is difficult. However, focusing on the core processing capabilities, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 typically offers superior image signal processing (ISP) compared to the Dimensity 7200, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in photos and videos. The absence of details regarding the main sensor resolution on both devices makes it hard to determine a clear winner, but the Motorola’s ISP advantage is a potential benefit.
Performance
The iQOO Z9 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4nm), featuring a dual-core configuration with 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 cores and 6x Cortex-A510 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, in its international variant, employs the Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) with a quad-core setup of 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 7200’s higher clock speeds on its prime cores suggest a potential edge in single-core performance, while the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s architecture may offer better sustained performance due to its more efficient core design. However, the LATAM version of the Edge 50 Fusion uses the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, which represents a significant performance downgrade compared to the 7s Gen 2 and the Dimensity 7200.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 12 hours and 40 minutes of active use. The iQOO Z9’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 44W wired charging allows for a 50% charge in 30 minutes. The Edge 50 Fusion’s 68W charging is significantly faster, reaching 50% in just 15 minutes. This faster charging is a considerable advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery. While the iQOO Z9’s charging isn’t slow, the Motorola’s speed provides greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z9 if you need a phone that can quickly top up its battery and maintain consistent performance during extended gaming sessions or multitasking. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion if you prioritize a vibrant, easily viewable display, and longer battery life for everyday use, even if it means slightly less peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion experience significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is a capable chip, it can be prone to thermal throttling under sustained heavy loads, especially in less optimally cooled devices. The Edge 50 Fusion’s thermal management performance will depend on its internal design, but users should expect some performance reduction during extended gaming.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the iQOO Z9 slow compared to the 68W on the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion?
While 68W is faster, 44W is still a respectable charging speed. The iQOO Z9 reaches 50% charge in 30 minutes, which is still relatively quick. The difference of 25 minutes to reach 50% is noticeable, but not a dealbreaker for all users.
❓ What is the impact of the different Snapdragon chipsets (7s Gen 2 vs 6 Gen 1) on the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion experience?
The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, found in the LATAM version of the Edge 50 Fusion, is a significantly less powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. Users in LATAM will experience noticeably slower app loading times, reduced gaming performance, and a less responsive overall experience.
