The sub-$500 flagship market is heating up. The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro, powered by the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, clashes with the vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+, boasting the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+. This comparison dissects their core strengths – raw power versus optimized efficiency – to determine which device delivers the best overall experience for demanding users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset provides a demonstrable performance edge, particularly in sustained workloads, and the significantly faster 120W charging is a compelling advantage. However, the iQOO Z9 Turbo+ offers a competitive package, especially for those prioritizing a potentially cooler gaming experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 24 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 24 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4500 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom
12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired
7.5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6400 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Titanium | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | V2417A | 23117RK66C |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 430 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
- Potentially better thermal management during prolonged gaming due to Dimensity 9300+’s efficiency.
- Competitive price point offering flagship performance.
- 80W fast charging is still a respectable speed.
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers superior overall performance.
- Slower charging speed compared to the Redmi K70 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 delivers class-leading performance.
- Ultra-fast 120W charging for minimal downtime.
- Advanced ISP for superior image processing.
- May run hotter under sustained load compared to the iQOO Z9 Turbo+.
- Potentially higher price tag.
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels (specs not provided), the core difference lies in the underlying processing power driving them. The chipset’s ability to efficiently render frames will impact perceived smoothness. The Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, with its advanced ISP, likely offers superior image processing capabilities for display enhancements. The iQOO Z9 Turbo+’s Dimensity 9300+ will also deliver a vibrant experience, but may not match the Snapdragon’s color accuracy or peak brightness potential.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP in the Redmi K70 Pro is renowned for its advanced image processing, potentially offering superior dynamic range, noise reduction, and video stabilization. The iQOO Z9 Turbo+’s Dimensity 9300+ ISP is capable, but generally lags behind Qualcomm’s flagship offerings. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the primary sensor – a likely feature on both – will be crucial for sharp, blur-free photos and videos, but sensor size and lens aperture will ultimately determine image quality.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Redmi K70 Pro (3.3 GHz Cortex-X4) holds a clear architectural advantage over the Dimensity 9300+ (3.4 GHz Cortex-X4) in the iQOO Z9 Turbo+. While the iQOO boasts a slightly higher clock speed on its prime core, the Snapdragon’s more refined Cortex-A720 configuration (3x3.2 GHz vs 3x2.85 GHz) and inclusion of Cortex-A520 cores (2x2.3 GHz) provide a broader performance profile. This translates to better multi-tasking and sustained performance under load. The 4nm fabrication process is shared, but Qualcomm’s optimizations typically yield superior thermal management, mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Redmi K70 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in approximately 18 minutes. This significantly surpasses the iQOO Z9 Turbo+’s 80W charging, which, while still fast, will take considerably longer. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Redmi K70 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3+ support on the Redmi K70 Pro also adds to its charging versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ if you prioritize sustained gaming performance and potentially lower peak temperatures, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power. Its Dimensity 9300+ is a formidable chip, and the 80W charging is still respectable. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you demand the absolute fastest performance in all tasks, including demanding applications and heavier multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid 120W charging. It’s the better choice for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9300+ in the iQOO Z9 Turbo+ throttle during extended gaming sessions like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 9300+ is a powerful chip, sustained gaming at high settings can generate significant heat. The iQOO Z9 Turbo+’s thermal design will play a crucial role, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Redmi K70 Pro generally exhibits better thermal management, potentially leading to less throttling and more consistent frame rates over longer periods.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the Redmi K70 Pro compared to the 80W charging on the iQOO Z9 Turbo+ in real-world use?
The Redmi K70 Pro’s 120W charging can realistically add around 50-60% charge in just 15 minutes, and fully charge the device in approximately 18 minutes. The iQOO Z9 Turbo+’s 80W charging will take closer to 30-45 minutes for a full charge. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Redmi K70 Pro offer a noticeable performance improvement in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both phones will feel incredibly responsive for everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a smoother and more fluid experience, especially when multitasking or switching between demanding applications. The difference may not be immediately apparent, but it becomes noticeable with heavier usage.
