iQOO Z9 Turbo+ vs iQOO 12 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users prioritizing raw performance and value, the iQOO Z9 Turbo+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ delivers comparable performance to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 at a significantly lower price point. However, the iQOO 12 Pro justifies its higher cost with faster 120W wired and 50W wireless charging, making it ideal for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ | vivo iQOO 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 24 | 2023, November 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 24 | Available. Released 2023, November 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 164.6 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, ulti-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired 7.5W reverse wired | 120W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6400 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Titanium | Black, Red, White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | V2417A | V2329A |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 650 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
- Exceptional performance for the price
- Flagship-level Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- Competitive 80W wired charging
- No wireless charging
- Potentially less refined camera system
vivo iQOO 12 Pro
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Potentially superior camera system
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers excellent sustained performance
- Significantly higher price
- May not offer a substantial performance uplift over the Z9 Turbo+ for all tasks
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels (data not provided), the core difference lies elsewhere. The iQOO 12 Pro, being the flagship, likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, improving power efficiency. The Z9 Turbo+ may prioritize a flat display for gaming comfort, while the 12 Pro could feature a curved edge design. Color accuracy is expected to be excellent on both, but the 12 Pro’s panel is likely calibrated to a higher standard.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are unavailable, but we can infer differences based on positioning. The iQOO 12 Pro, as the flagship, likely features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) and a more sophisticated image processing pipeline. The Z9 Turbo+ will likely focus on delivering good image quality at a lower cost, potentially sacrificing features like OIS or utilizing a smaller sensor. The inclusion of a telephoto lens is more probable on the 12 Pro, offering greater zoom capabilities. We anticipate both phones will include ultrawide lenses, but the 12 Pro’s will likely have a wider field of view and better image quality.
Performance
The heart of the comparison is the chipset battle. The iQOO Z9 Turbo+’s MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) features a unique CPU configuration with a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 cores, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores. The iQOO 12 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) with a 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 generally holds a slight edge in sustained performance due to Qualcomm’s thermal management expertise, the Dimensity 9300+’s aggressive core configuration delivers comparable peak performance. Both phones utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the 12 Pro may benefit from faster RAM speeds or larger capacity options.
Battery Life
The iQOO Z9 Turbo+ supports 80W wired charging, while the iQOO 12 Pro boasts a significantly faster 120W wired charging solution. This translates to a much quicker 0-100% charge time for the 12 Pro. Furthermore, the 12 Pro adds 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Z9 Turbo+. While the Z9 Turbo+ may have a slightly larger battery capacity to compensate for the slower charging, the 12 Pro’s charging speed is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding tasks without breaking the bank. It’s the ideal choice for budget-conscious enthusiasts. Buy the vivo iQOO 12 Pro if you prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds, including wireless, and are willing to pay a premium for a more complete flagship experience with potentially better long-term software support.