iQOO Z9 Turbo+ vs Samsung Galaxy A55: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the iQOO Z9 Turbo+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset delivers significantly more processing power. However, the Samsung Galaxy A55 excels in battery endurance and offers a more polished software experience, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 24 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 24 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired 7.5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6400 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Titanium | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | V2417A | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
- Significantly faster processor with Dimensity 9300+
- Ultra-fast 80W wired charging
- Potential for superior gaming performance
- Camera specifications are unknown
- Battery life potentially lower than A55
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Excellent battery life (13:27h active use)
- Bright and color-accurate display (1010 nits)
- Refined software experience with One UI
- Slower processor compared to Dimensity 9300+
- Slower 25W charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1010 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Z9 Turbo+'s display specifications are not provided, Samsung’s panel technology is known for its color accuracy and viewing angles. The A55’s brightness advantage is significant, particularly for outdoor use. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to conserve battery, but the A55’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the iQOO Z9 Turbo+, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, Samsung typically focuses on image processing and software optimization. The Galaxy A55 likely benefits from Samsung’s established camera algorithms, delivering consistent and pleasing results. The absence of information regarding sensor size or OIS on the iQOO makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance or video stabilization capabilities. We can assume the A55 will offer a more refined and predictable camera experience, while the iQOO’s camera performance remains an unknown quantity.
Performance
The iQOO Z9 Turbo+’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring a unique CPU configuration with Cortex-X4 cores clocked up to 3.4 GHz. This architecture is designed for sustained peak performance, eclipsing the Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 (4nm) which utilizes older Cortex-A78 cores at 2.75 GHz. The Dimensity 9300+’s superior core design and clock speeds translate to significantly faster processing and graphics capabilities, making the iQOO the better choice for demanding games and multitasking. The iQOO’s likely faster RAM (LPDDR5x is expected) further enhances its performance edge. Thermal management will be crucial for the iQOO to sustain this performance, but the 4nm process should help.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 13 hours and 27 minutes of active use. While the iQOO Z9 Turbo+'s battery capacity is not specified, its 80W wired charging is a substantial advantage over the A55’s 25W charging. This means the iQOO can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. Even if the iQOO has a slightly smaller battery, the faster charging speed could offset this difference for many users. The A55 prioritizes longevity, while the iQOO prioritizes quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, demanding applications, or future-proofing. Its 80W charging is a game-changer for minimizing downtime. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a longer-lasting battery, a refined user experience with Samsung’s One UI, and a more balanced feature set focused on everyday usability.