iQOO Z9 Turbo+ vs Motorola Edge 40 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and incredibly fast charging, the iQOO Z9 Turbo+ emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ offers a slight edge in CPU performance, and 80W charging is still very competitive. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro provides a more balanced experience with wireless charging and a potentially more polished software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ | Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 24 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 24 | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4500 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired 7.5W reverse wired | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6400 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Titanium | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue |
| Models | V2417A | - |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 313.87 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
- Potentially higher CPU performance with Dimensity 9300+
- Very fast 80W wired charging
- Likely more aggressive pricing
- No wireless charging
- Limited camera details available
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Faster 125W wired charging
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Slightly older Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- May be more expensive
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 1050 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Z9 Turbo+'s display specifications are not provided, it's reasonable to assume it falls within a similar range given its market positioning. The Edge 40 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a high-quality OLED panel. Without specific details on the iQOO’s panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate), it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Motorola’s measured brightness gives it a slight advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited. The context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities for both. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is challenging. It’s likely the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, given its flagship positioning, will offer a more refined camera experience with better image processing and potentially larger sensors. The iQOO Z9 Turbo+ may prioritize computational photography to compensate for potentially smaller sensors.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Z9 Turbo+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+, built on a 4nm process, featuring a unique CPU configuration with a 3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core and three additional Cortex-X4 cores. This contrasts with the Motorola Edge 40 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (also 4nm) which employs a more traditional core arrangement – one Cortex-X3, two Cortex-A715, two Cortex-A710, and three Cortex-A510. The Dimensity 9300+'s emphasis on high-clocked X4 cores suggests a potential advantage in single-core performance, beneficial for responsive UI and certain gaming scenarios. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a proven performer with excellent thermal management. Both devices utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the iQOO’s chipset architecture may allow it to better leverage that memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating solid battery life. Its 125W wired charging is significantly faster than the iQOO Z9 Turbo+'s 80W, achieving a full charge in just 23 minutes compared to an estimated longer time for the iQOO. The Edge 40 Pro also adds the convenience of 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the iQOO. While the iQOO’s 80W is still fast, the Motorola’s charging speed and wireless capabilities provide a more versatile charging experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ if you are a power user demanding the absolute fastest CPU performance for gaming and multitasking, and prioritize charging speed above all else. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Pro if you value a more complete package with wireless charging, a potentially more refined software experience, and a slightly longer battery endurance rating, even if it means sacrificing a small amount of raw CPU power.