vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: Which Mid-Range Powerhouse Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi 14T Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ offers a slight CPU advantage, coupled with 120W charging that fully replenishes the battery in just 19 minutes, a feature the iQOO Z9 Turbo can't match.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 29 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194.9 g (6.88 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired 7.5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint, White | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | V2352A | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | About 260 EUR | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
- Potentially better thermal management due to Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 efficiency
- Streamlined software experience (typical of iQOO)
- Competitive price point
- Slower charging speed (80W vs 120W)
- No wireless charging support
- Display brightness likely lower than Xiaomi 14T Pro
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Faster 120W wired charging (19 minutes to full)
- 50W wireless charging support
- Brighter display (1228 nits)
- Potentially stronger CPU performance with Dimensity 9300+
- May be more prone to thermal throttling under sustained load
- Potentially higher price
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be feature-rich but also bloated
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1228 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the iQOO Z9 Turbo. This higher brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s superior brightness and potential for higher refresh rates (based on Xiaomi’s typical implementation) give it an edge for multimedia consumption. The iQOO Z9 Turbo’s display specs are currently limited, making a definitive comparison difficult, but the Xiaomi’s panel is demonstrably brighter.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to expect both phones to feature capable main sensors. The Xiaomi 14T Pro, being a more premium offering, may incorporate a larger sensor or more advanced image processing algorithms. The iQOO Z9 Turbo likely prioritizes value, potentially sacrificing some camera features for a lower price point. We can assume both will offer standard features like HDR and night mode, but the Xiaomi is more likely to include features like optical image stabilization (OIS) on its main sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ features a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, alongside 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 cores, offering a potential CPU performance advantage over the iQOO Z9 Turbo’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720). Both chips are built on a 4nm process, suggesting similar efficiency. However, the Dimensity 9300+'s unique core configuration may provide better multi-core performance. Both devices utilize an Octa-core setup, but the Xiaomi’s higher clock speeds and core arrangement suggest a slight edge in raw processing power. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is known for its efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. The iQOO Z9 Turbo’s 80W charging is respectable, but considerably slower. The Xiaomi also adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the iQOO Z9 Turbo. While the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s active use score of 12:32h is provided, the iQOO Z9 Turbo’s battery capacity is not. However, the faster charging speeds of the Xiaomi effectively mitigate any potential battery capacity disadvantage, making it more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo if you prioritize sustained gaming performance and a more focused, streamlined software experience. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is a potent chip for demanding titles. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you value faster charging speeds, a brighter display, and a more versatile feature set, including wireless charging, making it ideal for users constantly on the go.