iQOO Z9 Turbo vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and gaming, the iQOO Z9 Turbo is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro offers a more well-rounded experience with significantly faster charging, a brighter display, and respectable performance for everyday tasks, making it ideal for mainstream users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo | Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2024, April 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 29 | Available. Released 2024, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194.9 g (6.88 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4500 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 720 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired 7.5W reverse wired | 125W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint, White | Luxe Lavender, Black Beauty, Moonlight Pearl, Vanilla Cream |
| Models | V2352A | XT2403-2 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 410.57 / $ 399.00 / £ 369.99 / ₹ 22,995 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Excellent for gaming and demanding tasks
- Aggressive pricing for the performance offered
- Charging speed is slower than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- Display brightness likely lower than the Edge 50 Pro
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- Ultra-fast 125W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Bright and vibrant display (1295 nits)
- Well-rounded feature set for everyday use
- Less powerful processor compared to the iQOO Z9 Turbo
- May struggle with the most demanding games at maximum settings
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1295 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the iQOO Z9 Turbo’s display specs are not provided, the Edge 50 Pro’s brightness advantage is substantial. The Edge 50 Pro’s panel likely benefits from its higher price point, allowing for more advanced display technology. The iQOO Z9 Turbo, focusing on cost-effectiveness, may utilize a less sophisticated panel, potentially impacting color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the iQOO Z9 Turbo, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro likely benefits from a more refined image processing pipeline, typical of Motorola’s flagship and mid-range offerings. The Edge 50 Pro’s sensor size and aperture are unknown, but the focus should be on the main sensor’s capabilities. The iQOO Z9 Turbo, aiming for value, may compromise on camera hardware to accommodate its powerful processor. It's reasonable to assume the Edge 50 Pro will deliver more consistent image quality across various lighting conditions.
Performance
The iQOO Z9 Turbo’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) is a substantial step up from the Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm). The 8s Gen 3 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, offering significantly higher peak performance compared to the Edge 50 Pro’s Cortex-A715 core at 2.63 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a superior gaming experience on the iQOO Z9 Turbo. While both chips are built on a 4nm process, the architectural differences favor the 8s Gen 3 in sustained performance and thermal efficiency. The iQOO Z9 Turbo’s CPU configuration (1+4+3) is also more balanced for demanding workloads.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro excels in charging speed, achieving a full charge in just 18 minutes with its 125W wired charging. This is significantly faster than the iQOO Z9 Turbo’s 80W charging. The Edge 50 Pro also supports 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the iQOO Z9 Turbo. While the iQOO Z9 Turbo offers 7.5W reverse wired charging, the Edge 50 Pro’s 10W reverse wireless charging provides more versatility. The Edge 50 Pro’s active use score of 11:59h suggests excellent battery life, potentially offsetting any capacity differences with the iQOO Z9 Turbo (capacity not provided).
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo if you are a mobile gamer, a power user who frequently edits videos or photos, or someone who demands the fastest possible processing speeds within a reasonable budget. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Pro if you prioritize fast charging, a vibrant display for media consumption, and a balanced feature set for everyday use, and aren't necessarily seeking the absolute highest performance.