iQOO Z9 Lite vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and rapid charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the stronger choice. Its 68W charging and impressive 10:28h active use battery score significantly outperform the iQOO Z9 Lite’s slower 15W charging and unspecified battery performance. However, the iQOO Z9 Lite may appeal to those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z9 Lite | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 15 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 20 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.6 x 8.4 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 840 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mocha Brown, Aqua Flow | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | I2306 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo iQOO Z9 Lite
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slow 15W charging
- Unspecified battery life – likely shorter than the Edge 40 Neo
- Likely lower display quality
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Significantly faster 68W charging
- Longer battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter and likely higher-quality display
- Higher price than the iQOO Z9 Lite
- May not be the absolute cheapest option
- Camera details are currently limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the iQOO Z9 Lite, which lacks published brightness data. While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the brighter display of the Edge 40 Neo will likely contribute to higher power consumption, but the larger battery mitigates this. We expect the iQOO Z9 Lite to have a standard LCD panel, while the Edge 40 Neo likely uses OLED, offering superior contrast and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Context data for both devices is limited regarding camera specifics. However, given the market positioning, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system. While both may include standard lenses, the Edge 40 Neo’s focus on a balanced experience suggests better image processing and potentially a larger main sensor. The iQOO Z9 Lite likely prioritizes cost savings, potentially resulting in a less refined camera experience. We anticipate the Edge 40 Neo will offer better low-light performance and more detailed images.
Performance
Both phones utilize MediaTek Dimensity chipsets fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 holds a performance edge. Its CPU features 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores compared to the iQOO Z9 Lite’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. While the core count is identical, the A78 architecture is more efficient and powerful. This translates to snappier app loading and smoother multitasking on the Motorola. The iQOO Z9 Lite will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Edge 40 Neo is better equipped for demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo clearly wins in the battery department. Its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80 hours demonstrate significantly longer battery life than the iQOO Z9 Lite, which lacks comparable data. Furthermore, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging, capable of delivering 50% charge in just 15 minutes, is a game-changer compared to the iQOO Z9 Lite’s slow 15W charging. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts usability and convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z9 Lite if you need a functional smartphone with a decent processor for everyday tasks and are extremely budget-conscious. You’ll be making compromises on charging speed and potentially battery life. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more refined experience with significantly faster charging, longer battery life, and a brighter, more vibrant display, even if it means spending a bit more.