vivo iQOO Z9 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around usability and rapid replenishment, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging and brighter display offer tangible benefits, outweighing the iQOO Z9’s slightly more efficient chipset. However, gamers on a budget should consider the iQOO Z9.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z9 (China) | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 29 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194.6 g (6.88 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired 7.5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | V2361A | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Z9 (China)
- Potentially better thermal management due to Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s core configuration.
- 7.5W reverse wired charging for topping up accessories.
- Strong performance for the price.
- Slower charging speed (80W vs 120W).
- Likely lower peak display brightness.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (0-100% in 19 minutes).
- Brighter display (1283 nits) for outdoor visibility.
- Excellent battery life (10:38h active use).
- Potentially less efficient CPU architecture.
- No reverse wireless charging.
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1283 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the iQOO Z9 (brightness data unavailable, but typically lower in this price bracket). While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display’s brightness impacts the overall user experience, especially for media consumption. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely employs a higher-quality panel, contributing to better color accuracy and viewing angles, though detailed panel technology (LTPO, PWM) is not specified in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system, given Xiaomi’s emphasis on camera technology in the Note series. The absence of sensor details for both phones necessitates caution, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s brand positioning suggests a greater investment in image processing and potentially larger sensor sizes. We can assume both phones will have a primary camera, ultrawide, and macro, but the quality will vary significantly.
Performance
Both phones utilize 4nm chipsets, but the architectures differ. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra features 2x Cortex-A715 cores clocked at 2.8 GHz, offering a theoretical single-core performance advantage over the iQOO Z9’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, which has 1x Cortex-A715 at 2.63 GHz. However, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s more efficient core configuration (1+4+3) may translate to better sustained performance and thermal management during prolonged gaming. The iQOO Z9’s CPU configuration suggests a focus on balancing performance and power consumption.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is a substantial advantage over the iQOO Z9’s 80W charging. While the iQOO Z9 offers 7.5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+, the faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is more impactful for most users. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ also boasts an active use score of 10:38h, indicating excellent battery life despite the faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z9 (China) if you need a phone optimized for sustained gaming sessions and value thermal efficiency over absolute peak performance. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 offers a strong balance of power and efficiency. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prefer a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds – getting you from 0 to 100% in under 20 minutes.