The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo iQOO Z8x and OnePlus Ace 2V represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both devices aim to deliver a smooth user experience, they take drastically different approaches to achieving it – one prioritizing raw power, the other focusing on value. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Ace 2V is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 9000 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, and the 80W charging drastically reduces downtime. While the iQOO Z8x offers a more affordable entry point, the Ace 2V’s performance advantage justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 31 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2023, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.6 g (7.05 oz) | 191.5 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Blue/Green |
| Models | V2312A | PHP110 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 310 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z8x
- More affordable price point
- Potentially better battery life during light use (due to efficient chipset)
- Sufficient for everyday tasks
- Significantly slower performance
- Slower charging speed
- Likely inferior camera quality
OnePlus Ace 2V
- Much faster performance with Dimensity 9000
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Likely superior camera system
- Higher price
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
- May require more frequent charging with heavy use
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the Ace 2V’s positioning, it likely features a higher-quality AMOLED panel with a higher refresh rate than the Z8x. The Ace 2V likely benefits from a more sophisticated display calibration process, resulting in more accurate colors. The Z8x, aiming for cost savings, may utilize a less expensive LCD or lower-tier AMOLED panel. Bezels are likely comparable, but the Ace 2V may have a slightly smaller chin due to its higher price point.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Ace 2V, being the more premium device, likely features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS). A larger sensor captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The Z8x likely relies on a smaller sensor and lacks OIS. Lens apertures are also likely wider on the Ace 2V, further improving low-light capabilities. Image processing algorithms will also differ, with the Ace 2V likely offering more sophisticated scene recognition and HDR processing. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and offers minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s Mediatek Dimensity 9000, built on a 4nm process, boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.05 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores. This architecture is significantly more powerful than the iQOO Z8x’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while efficient, relies on four Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz, representing an older generation of CPU design. The Dimensity 9000’s superior GPU will translate to a much smoother gaming experience, especially in demanding titles. The Ace 2V likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance. Thermal management will be crucial for the Ace 2V to sustain peak performance, but the Dimensity 9000’s 4nm node should aid in heat dissipation.
Battery Life
The iQOO Z8x’s 44W wired charging is respectable, but the OnePlus Ace 2V’s 80W charging is a game-changer. OnePlus claims a full charge in just 32 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Ace 2V effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the Z8x is more power-efficient, potentially offering slightly longer battery life during light usage, but the Ace 2V’s performance advantage will likely offset this in real-world scenarios.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z8x if you prioritize affordability and efficient power consumption for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. It’s ideal for users who don’t demand peak performance or rapid charging. Buy the OnePlus Ace 2V if you’re a power user who values speed, enjoys mobile gaming, and appreciates the convenience of incredibly fast charging. This phone is for those who want a near-flagship experience without the flagship price tag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the iQOO Z8x struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is not designed for graphically intensive games. While you might be able to run Genshin Impact at lower settings, expect significant frame drops and a less-than-ideal gaming experience. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s Dimensity 9000 is far better suited for demanding titles.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the OnePlus Ace 2V compared to the 44W charging on the iQOO Z8x in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. OnePlus claims a full charge in 32 minutes with 80W, while the iQOO Z8x will likely take over an hour to reach 100%. This means you can quickly top up the Ace 2V during short breaks, minimizing downtime.
❓ Is the iQOO Z8x a good choice for someone who primarily uses their phone for social media and web browsing?
Absolutely. The iQOO Z8x’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is perfectly adequate for everyday tasks like social media, web browsing, and streaming videos. Its power efficiency will also contribute to longer battery life during these activities.
❓ Does the OnePlus Ace 2V get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9000 is a powerful chip and can generate heat under sustained load. While OnePlus likely incorporates thermal management solutions, some throttling is possible during prolonged gaming. However, the Ace 2V’s superior cooling system should mitigate this better than comparable devices.
