vivo iQOO Z8x vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Mid-Range Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter, more visually appealing display, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the winner. Its 68W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the measured 1073 nits brightness provides excellent outdoor visibility. However, the iQOO Z8x remains a strong contender for those seeking a balance of performance and affordability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z8x | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 31 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.6 g (7.05 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2312A | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo iQOO Z8x
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- Solid performance for everyday tasks
- Slower 44W charging
- Likely less bright display
- Camera likely less prioritized
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Brighter 1073 nits display
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Potentially higher price
- May experience more thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor usability, where the iQOO Z8x’s display specifications are currently unknown. While the iQOO Z8x likely offers a respectable panel, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness level suggests a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel technology is also likely to offer better color accuracy and viewing angles, though detailed calibration data is unavailable for either device.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of sensor information for both devices. However, the market positioning suggests the Edge 40 Neo likely prioritizes camera quality more than the iQOO Z8x. Motorola often focuses on computational photography, potentially delivering better image processing. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Edge 40 Neo, if present, would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, holds a theoretical CPU performance edge over the iQOO Z8x’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78). However, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 benefits from a more efficient 4nm manufacturing process compared to the Dimensity 7030’s 6nm node. This translates to potentially better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The iQOO Z8x’s efficiency could be particularly noticeable during extended gaming sessions, minimizing throttling. The Edge 40 Neo’s CPU configuration, with 6x A55 cores versus the Z8x’s 4, may offer better multi-tasking performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a clear win, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime compared to the iQOO Z8x’s 44W charging. While the iQOO Z8x’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80h demonstrate excellent battery life. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s efficiency in the iQOO Z8x could partially offset the slower charging speed, but the Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging remains a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z8x if you need a dependable performer for everyday tasks and light gaming, and value a slightly more conservative price point. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more immersive viewing experience with a brighter screen, faster charging capabilities, and a more refined overall user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.