vivo iQOO Z7x vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 12 Pro edges out the iQOO Z7x thanks to its superior display, more powerful chipset, and faster charging. While the iQOO Z7x boasts impressive charging speed, the Redmi Note 12 Pro offers a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z7x | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 20 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 70% in 34 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Tropical Blue, Metallic Grey, Orange | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | V2272A | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z7x
- Incredibly fast 80W charging
- Large display
- Good value for money
- 5G Connectivity
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Camera performance may be limited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Versatile camera system
- Excellent battery life
- Slower charging than iQOO Z7x
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro takes the display crown with its measured 890 nits peak brightness, offering significantly better visibility in sunlight. Its infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent image quality. The iQOO Z7x has a good display, but lacks the brightness and contrast of the Redmi Note 12 Pro. Both feature similar resolutions, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro's panel is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro likely has a more versatile camera system, although specific details are missing. The inclusion of 'Photo / Video' suggests a focus on both still and moving images. The iQOO Z7x's camera is decent, but likely doesn't match the Redmi Note 12 Pro's capabilities. Expect better image processing and potentially more features on the Redmi Note 12 Pro.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's Dimensity 1080 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the iQOO Z7x's Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 1080's Cortex-A78 cores offer better CPU performance for demanding tasks and gaming. While the iQOO Z7x is capable, the Redmi Note 12 Pro delivers a smoother and more responsive experience.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life. The Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 97 hours and active use score of 12:08h. The iQOO Z7x's 80W charging is a standout feature, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. However, the Redmi Note 12 Pro's 67W charging is still quite fast and the longer battery life gives it an edge overall.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Z7x is ideal for users prioritizing incredibly fast charging and a large display on a tight budget. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is a better choice for those seeking a brighter, smoother display, stronger performance, and a more versatile camera system.