The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo iQOO Z7x and Xiaomi Poco X5 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at an attractive price point, but which one reigns supreme? This detailed comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Z7x takes the lead with its significantly faster 80W charging, a major convenience. However, the Poco X5 boasts exceptional battery life and a brighter display. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: speed or endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 20 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 24 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 70% in 34 min | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Tropical Blue, Metallic Grey, Orange | Jaguar Black, Wildcat Blue, Supernova Green |
| Models | V2272A | 22111317PG, 22111317PI |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 106h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.3 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 400895 (v9)
GeekBench: 2088 (v5.1) |
vivo iQOO Z7x
- 80W Fast Charging
- Sleek Design
- Decent Performance
- Shorter Battery Life
- Potentially Less Bright Display
Xiaomi Poco X5
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Brighter Display
- Good Value
- Slower Charging
- Camera Performance Could Be Better
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 edges out the iQOO Z7x with a measured peak brightness of 728 nits, making it more visible in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Z7x's display is perfectly adequate, the Poco X5's higher brightness provides a noticeable advantage. Both feature similar resolution and panel technology (likely AMOLED on both).
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to definitively declare a winner without detailed testing. Both phones feature capable camera systems, but image quality will depend on software processing and specific shooting conditions. Expect decent results in good lighting, but low-light performance may be a weakness for both.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and CPU configuration, meaning performance will be very similar in everyday tasks and gaming. Expect smooth multitasking and decent gaming performance at medium settings. Differences will likely be minimal.
Battery Life
The Poco X5 shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 106 hours. The iQOO Z7x, while offering faster charging, has a smaller battery and therefore shorter overall battery life. This is a significant advantage for the Poco X5.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Z7x is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging and don't mind potentially slightly less battery longevity. The Xiaomi Poco X5 is perfect for those who value long battery life and a brighter screen for outdoor use, even if charging is slower.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
Both phones offer similar gaming performance due to the same chipset. Expect decent performance at medium settings, but don't expect flagship-level gaming experiences.
❓ Is the iQOO Z7x's fast charging worth it?
If you frequently find yourself needing a quick top-up, the 80W charging on the iQOO Z7x is a significant advantage. However, if you rarely charge your phone, the Poco X5's longer battery life might be more beneficial.
